Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Kicking the can down the road? Referral services and a school-based primary healthcare service for rural primary school children.

Rural and remote health·2026

Same author

Validation of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Life Participation (SONG-LP) Instrument in People with CKD.

Kidney360·2026

Same author

Validation of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology - Life Participation (SONG-LP) Instrument in People Receiving Dialysis.

Kidney international reports·2026

Same author

Establishing a core outcome measure for cancer in trials in kidney transplantation: a standardized outcomes in nephrology-kidney transplantation consensus workshop report.

Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation·2026

Same author

Graft survival and rejection with repeated human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch in kidney transplantation: a retrospective multicentre cohort study protocol.

BMC nephrology·2026

Same author

Bovine Lactoferrin Compared With Ferrous sulfate for Treating Iron-Deficiency Anemia in Bangladeshi Women-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Journal of nutrition·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Statistical analysis of noncommensurate multiple outcomes.

Armando Teixeira-Pinto¹, Laura Mauri

¹Unit of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine and CINTESIS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. tpinto@post.harvard.edu

Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

|November 17, 2011

Summary

Researchers often analyze multiple correlated outcomes separately. This study explores multivariate methods for simultaneously analyzing noncommensurate outcomes, offering advantages for complex data analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Clinical Trials
Health Outcomes Research

Background:

Multiple outcomes are frequently collected in studies to assess treatment effectiveness and risk factors.
Correlated outcomes measured on the same individuals are often analyzed independently, potentially overlooking valuable information.
Standard statistical methods struggle with analyzing noncommensurate outcomes (e.g., mixed binary and continuous data) simultaneously.

Purpose of the Study:

To contrast various statistical approaches for analyzing noncommensurate multiple outcomes.
To highlight the benefits of employing multivariate methods for joint outcome analysis.
To demonstrate these methods using a clinical trial example.

Main Methods:

Review and comparison of statistical methodologies for analyzing noncommensurate outcomes.
Discussion of multivariate approaches for simultaneous outcome analysis.
Application of methods to a real-world clinical trial dataset.

Main Results:

Independent analysis of correlated outcomes can be suboptimal.
Multivariate methods offer a more comprehensive approach to analyzing noncommensurate outcomes.
The chosen multivariate method effectively handles mixed data types and missing data scenarios.

Conclusions:

Simultaneous analysis of noncommensurate outcomes using multivariate methods is advantageous.
These methods provide a more robust analysis, especially when dealing with missing data.
The study illustrates the practical application and benefits of multivariate analysis in clinical research.