Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026
12:09
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
Published on: March 19, 2014
Cross-species studies of orbitofrontal cortex and value-based decision-making.
1Department of Psychology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA. wallis@berkeley.edu
Nature Neuroscience
|November 22, 2011
Summary
Discrepancies in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) research between humans and animals may stem from anatomical, task, and methodological differences. Addressing these is key to integrating findings and advancing our understanding of OFC function.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Comparative Psychology
Background:
- The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is crucial for value-based decision-making.
- Significant discrepancies exist between human and animal model findings regarding OFC function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate potential reasons for discrepancies in OFC research between species.
- To enhance the integration of findings from animal models into human OFC research.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of anatomical differences between human and animal OFC.
- Evaluation of behavioral task variations used in decision-making studies.
- Assessment of methodological differences in neural function assessment.
Main Results:
- Identified anatomical variations as a potential source of divergent results.
- Highlighted how different behavioral tasks can influence decision-making outcomes.
- Discussed the impact of varying neuroscientific methodologies on OFC research.
Conclusions:
- Differences in anatomy, tasks, and methods significantly impact OFC research interpretations.
- Resolving these discrepancies is essential for a unified understanding of OFC's role in decision-making.
- Integrating animal and human studies will accelerate progress in neuroscience.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
01:20Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
Primary Appraisal:...
01:21Association Areas of the Cortex
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
01:23Cognition and Behavior
Social psychology examines the complex interplay between individual mental processes and social interactions. Historically, the field was divided into two domains: social behavior and social cognition. Researchers focusing on social behavior analyzed actions within social contexts, such as conformity, aggression, or cooperation. Meanwhile, social cognition researchers investigated how people perceive, interpret, and mentally represent their social environments. However, modern perspectives no...