Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Auditory temporal integration and the power function model.

G M Gerken1, V K Bhat, M Hutchison-Clutter

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Auditory temporal integration is best described by a power function model using an assigned duration definition. This model effectively quantifies how the brain processes sound over time, factoring out stimulus rise/fall effects.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of fascia and free skin graft on the healing of mastoid cavity after canal wall down mastoidectomy.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
Same author

A DPP-IV-resistant triple-acting agonist of GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon receptors with potent glucose-lowering and insulinotropic actions in high-fat-fed mice.

Diabetologia·2013
Same author

Neurotic disorders in children: a psycho-social study.

Indian journal of psychiatry·2011
Same author

Reliability of saliva lithium level-a prospective study.

Indian journal of psychiatry·2011
Same author

Cerebral laterality in schizophrenia.

Indian journal of psychiatry·2011
Same author

Myxoedema presenting with psychosis.

Indian journal of psychiatry·2011

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Understanding auditory temporal integration is crucial for explaining auditory perception.
  • Existing models and definitions of stimulus duration vary, complicating quantitative analysis.
  • The role of stimulus rise/fall times in auditory integration requires further clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To improve the quantitative description of the auditory temporal integration function.
  • To refine the definition of stimulus duration as the primary independent variable.
  • To evaluate different models and definitions using existing and new experimental data.

Main Methods:

  • Uniform analysis of temporal integration data from 20 previous studies.
  • Evaluation of two auditory temporal integration models and definitions of duration.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experimental measurement of detection thresholds in 11 normal-hearing subjects using single- and multiple-burst acoustic stimuli at 3.125 kHz.

    • Main Results:

    • A power function model combined with an 'assigned duration' definition best described existing temporal integration data.
    • Stimulus frequency significantly affected the integration function slope (typically < 10 dB/decade).
    • Experimental data also supported the power function and assigned duration model, with similar integration exponents for single- and multiple-burst stimuli (approx. 0.6 at 3.125 kHz).

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory temporal integration is optimally described by a power function with an assigned duration definition.
    • The contribution of stimulus rise/fall times can be empirically separated from the integration process.
    • The findings suggest properties of a central auditory integrator and its frequency/hearing level dependency.