[Gender differences among medical students in the approach to simulation]

Area of Science:

• Medical Education
• Simulation Training
• Endoscopy

Background:

• Simulation-based training is increasingly replacing traditional apprenticeship models in medical education.
• Understanding gender-based differences in prerequisites and performance in simulation is crucial.
• This study addresses potential disparities in how male and female medical students approach simulation training.

Purpose of the Study:

• To investigate performance differences between male and female medical students using a bronchoscope simulator.
• To identify if gender influences the approach to simulation-based medical training.

Main Methods:

• 62 medical students (33 male, 29 female) participated in a bronchoscopy simulation task.
• Participants aimed to visualize maximum orifices within five minutes without mucosal impingement.
• Performance data, including segments visualized and mucous membrane impingements, were collected via the simulator.

Main Results:

• Male participants visualized significantly more segments (p=0.045) compared to females.
• Male students exhibited significantly more mucous membrane impingements (p=0.045).
• The study's gender distribution did not mirror that of a Danish medical school, suggesting higher male interest in simulation.

Conclusions:

• Gender differences in performance and approach were observed in bronchoscopy simulation.
• These disparities necessitate consideration during the planning and assessment of simulation-based medical education.
• Tailoring simulation training strategies based on gender may enhance learning outcomes.