Incidence and nature of testicular toxicity findings in pharmaceutical development

Jennifer C Sasaki1, Robert E Chapin, David Gregory Hall

  • 1Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Raritan, New Jersey. jennifer.sasaki@alkermes.com

Abstract

Insights

Testicular toxicity (TT) is an uncommon but persistent challenge in drug development. Early identification through improved screening platforms is needed to reduce safety evaluation costs and time.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive toxicology
  • Drug development
  • Preclinical safety assessment

Background:

  • Testicular toxicity (TT) presents unique challenges in pharmaceutical development.
  • Focus on other toxicities like hepatic injury has overshadowed TT research.
  • Developing effective TT screening assays and biomarkers remains a priority.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the current landscape of testicular toxicity in drug development.
  • To prioritize future research and activities in developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART).
  • To understand the incidence and nature of TT findings.

Main Methods:

  • A survey was conducted, sponsored by the International Life Sciences Institute-Health and Environmental Sciences Institute DART Technical Committee.
  • 16 survey respondents provided insights into their experiences with TT.
  • Data collection focused on the occurrence, interpretation, and management of TT.

Main Results:

  • Preclinical TT was infrequent, but half of respondents encountered repeated issues.
  • Interpreting TT remains challenging despite control measures like using mature animals.
  • Both traditional methods (hormonal monitoring) and novel approaches (-omics) are used.
  • Risk assessment involves species specificity, mode of action, and safety margins.

Conclusions:

  • Testicular toxicity is a persistent, though uncommon, hurdle in pharmaceutical development.
  • Current preclinical methods help mitigate clinical trial attrition.
  • Enhanced biomarker and screening platforms are crucial for earlier TT detection.
  • Earlier identification of TT can significantly reduce safety evaluation time and resources.

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions01:24

Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions

Drug toxicities can be stratified into pharmacological, pathological, or genotoxic based on their mechanisms. The incidence and severity of these toxicities generally increase with the drug's concentration in the body and exposure time.Pharmacological toxicity is evident when the therapeutic effects of drugs overshoot into adverse reactions in a predictable, dose-dependent manner. Central nervous system (CNS) depression from barbiturates is a classic example, with effects escalating from...
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions01:16

Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions

Idiosyncratic drug reactions represent abnormal chemical responses that vary significantly among individuals, ranging from extreme sensitivity to low doses to insensitivity to high doses. These reactions often occur due to the drug's covalent binding with serum proteins, forming a foreign hapten that triggers an immunotoxicological response. The variability in drug reactions has a strong pharmacogenetic foundation, with genetic differences crucial in how individuals metabolize drugs. For...
Toxicokinetics: Overview01:21

Toxicokinetics: Overview

Studies that assess how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted (ADME) at toxic doses are termed toxicokinetics. Understanding toxicokinetics helps predict adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and manage toxicity in humans.Toxicokinetics differs from pharmacokinetics mainly in the dose levels studied, with toxicokinetics focusing on higher toxic doses. The kinetics at these levels can be non-linear due to altered physiological processes. Toxicodynamics examines the relationship...