Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
Cause and effect in biology revisited: is Mayr's proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful?
Kevin N Laland1, Kim Sterelny, John Odling-Smee
1School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 9TS, UK. knl1@st-andrews.ac.uk
Abstract:
Fifty years ago, Ernst Mayr published a hugely influential paper on the nature of causation in biology, in which he distinguished between proximate and ultimate causes. Mayr equated proximate causation with immediate factors (for example, physiology) and ultimate causation with evolutionary explanations (for example, natural selection). He argued that proximate and ultimate causes addressed different questions and were not alternatives. Mayr's account of causation remains widely accepted today, with both positive and negative ramifications. Several current debates in biology (for example, over evolution and development, niche construction, cooperation, and the evolution of language) are linked by a common axis of acceptance/rejection of Mayr's model of causation. We argue that Mayr's formulation has acted to stabilize the dominant evolutionary paradigm against change but may now hamper progress in the biological sciences.
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Cause and Effect
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Correlation and Causation
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Evolutionary Psychology
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

