Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
Published on: January 6, 2023
Permanent epicardial pacing in pediatric patients: 12-year experience at a single center
Jae Gun Kwak1, Soo-Jin Kim, Jin Young Song
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Pediatric epicardial pacemakers showed good lead longevity but variable generator longevity. Lead type and patient age did not impact lead longevity, while generator longevity was independent of these factors.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Implantable Devices
Background:
- Permanent cardiac pacing in children is uncommon, typically utilizing epicardial pacing.
- This study reviews a 12-year experience with epicardial pacemaker implantation in pediatric patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term outcomes of epicardial pacemaker implantation in children.
- To assess the longevity and influencing factors of pacemaker leads and generators in a pediatric population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 53 patients (<18 years) who received their first epicardial pacemaker between 1997-2009.
- Analysis of generator and lead replacement operations, including generator mode (DDDR most common) and lead type (non-steroid-eluting more frequent).
Main Results:
- Lead longevity averaged 10.8 years, unaffected by lead type or patient age.
- Generator longevity showed a trend towards earlier exhaustion in younger patients but was not significantly impacted by generator mode, lead type, or patient age.
- Freedom from generator replacement was 11.1% at 8 years, while freedom from lead replacement was 63.6% at 10 years.
Conclusions:
- Epicardial pacemaker leads demonstrate sufficient longevity in pediatric patients, irrespective of lead type or patient age.
- Generator longevity in pediatric epicardial pacing is not significantly influenced by lead type, generator mode, or patient age at implantation.
Background:
Permanent cardiac pacing is not often done in children, and when done is usually accomplished through epicardial pacing. We reviewed a 12-year experience with the implantation of epicardial pacemakers by our clinical group.
Methods:
Fifty-three patients who underwent their first implantation of an epicardial pacemaker before the age of 18 years and between 1997 and 2009 were included in our study. The mean age of the patients at the time of first pacemaker implantation was 5.7±4.8 years. Indications for pacemaker implantation included postoperative or congenital atrioventricular block and sinus node dysfunction. The patients underwent 105 operations for the replacement of pacemaker pulse generators and 75 operations for the replacement of pacemaker leads. The most commonly used generator mode was the rate-responsive accelerometer-based (DDDR) mode, which was used in 40.9% of the patients. We used more non-steroid-eluting leads (70.1%) than steroid-eluting leads (29.1%).
Results:
The overall duration of follow-up in the study was 8.0±4.5 years (range, 2.1 months to approximately 17.0 years). Freedom from the need for generator replacement was 98.0%, 60.7%, and 11.1% at 1, 5, and 8 years, respectively. A tendency toward early generator exhaustion was observed among younger patients (p=0.058). The generator mode used for pacing did not significantly affect generator longevity. Freedom from the need for lead replacement was 98.3%, 83.8%, and 63.6% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The mean longevity of the leads used in the study was 10.8±0.8 years. Neither patient age at the time of lead implantation nor type of lead significantly affected lead longevity.
Conclusions:
Lead longevity was sufficiently long and did not vary significantly according to type of lead. Generator longevity was not affected by lead type, generator mode, or patient age at the time of pacemaker implantation.
More Related Videos
10:05Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017