Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

10:25
Simultaneous Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 5, 2017
Evaluation of unintended electrical stimulation from MR gradient fields.
Howard I Bassen1, Leonardo M Angelone
1Division of Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA. howard.bassen@fda.hhs.gov
Frontiers in Bioscience (Elite Edition)
|December 29, 2011
Summary
Computational modeling of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety for active implants like pacemakers revealed that induced electric fields near the lead tip are influenced by mesh size and probe dimensions.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging Physics
- Computational Electromagnetics
Background:
- Patients with active implants (e.g., cardiac pacemakers, neurostimulators) face safety risks during MRI due to magnetic gradient fields.
- Induced electric fields and currents along implant leads, particularly at the distal tip, can cause unintended stimulation.
- Previous experimental evaluations of these induced fields have been conducted.
Purpose of the Study:
- To computationally evaluate the electric fields induced in active implant leads during MRI.
- To compare computational results with existing experimental data.
- To assess the influence of computational parameters and experimental probe design on results.
Main Methods:
- Utilized two commercial software packages, SemcadX and COMSOL Multiphysics, for computational modeling.
- Analyzed electric field values within 1-3 mm of the implant lead's distal tip.
- Investigated the impact of the two-electrode experimental probe and computational mesh resolution on the results.
Main Results:
- Computational results showed reasonable agreement with prior experimental data at distances greater than 2-3 mm from the lead tip.
- Significant variations (up to one order of magnitude) were observed based on computational mesh size (0.1 mm for SemcadX vs. 0.5 mm for COMSOL).
- The dimensions of the two-electrode probe notably affected the computed electric field values.
Conclusions:
- Computational methods can effectively evaluate induced electric fields in active implants during MRI.
- Careful consideration of computational mesh resolution and experimental probe dimensions is crucial for accurate safety assessments.
- Findings highlight the need for precise parameter selection in both simulation and experimental studies for reliable MRI safety evaluations.
