Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026
05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Surgical protocols for early implant placement in post-extraction sockets: a systematic review
Ignacio Sanz1, Maria Garcia-Gargallo, David Herrera
1ETEP Research Group, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Clinical Oral Implants Research
|January 4, 2012
Summary
Early dental implant placement after tooth extraction may preserve bone and soft tissue better than delayed placement. While early placement shows potential advantages, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Oral Surgery
- Periodontology
Background:
- Optimal timing for dental implant placement post-extraction is debated.
- Understanding dimensional changes and success rates is crucial for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare early versus delayed dental implant placement.
- To evaluate hard and soft tissue changes, implant survival, and prosthesis success.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort, and retrospective case-control studies.
- Searched major databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) up to February 2011.
- Included studies with at least 1-month follow-up post-loading.
Main Results:
- Early implant placement favored reduced bone height (13.11%) and width (19.85%) reduction.
- Implant survival rates were non-significantly higher in the early placement group (RR=1.02).
- Early placement showed statistically significant patient satisfaction at 2 years, but this diminished by 5 years.
Conclusions:
- Early dental implant placement may offer benefits for tissue preservation compared to delayed protocols.
- High-quality, randomized clinical trials are necessary due to limited current evidence.
- Further research is needed to solidify the advantages of early implant placement.
