Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning01:15

Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning

Classical conditioning not only includes the initial pairing of stimuli but also extends to more complex forms, such as higher-order conditioning. Higher-order conditioning involves creating associations beyond the primary conditioned stimulus, resulting in a chain of conditioned responses.
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anxiety, Cognitive Biases, and Evaluative Conditioning: An Eye-Tracking Experiment.

International review of social psychology·2026
Same author

Assessing the Relational Abilities of Large Language Models and Large Reasoning Models.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

The HEXACO Adjective Scale: A Cross-Cultural Validity Study.

Journal of personality assessment·2025
Same author

Octave Equivalence: Difficult to Perceive, But Improvements Are Possible With Training.

Experimental psychology·2025
Same author

Re-examining Spontaneous Trait Transference from an Attributional Perspective.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025
Same author

Long-term Contingency Learning Depends on Contingency Awareness.

Journal of cognition·2025
Same journal

EXPRESS: The Effect of Response-code on Stroop Interference and Facilitation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Does temporal contiguity moderate contingency learning in a speeded performance task?

James R Schmidt1, Jan De Houwer

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. james.schmidt@ugent.be

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|January 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Distracting stimuli do not require close timing to influence learning. This study found contingency learning effects even when distracting nonwords and target words were separated by long intervals, impacting causal judgment research.

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Contingency learning involves associating events based on their co-occurrence.
  • The temporal relationship between stimuli is crucial for associative learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of temporal contiguity in contingency learning.
  • To determine how varying stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) affects learning in a word-word contingency task.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments used a word-word contingency learning paradigm.
  • Distractor nonwords were paired with target color words at varying SOAs.
  • Contingency effects were measured by response times to target words.

Main Results:

  • Contingency effects were observed across a wide range of SOAs, including short, long, and negative (stimulus presented before target) intervals.
  • Learning remained significant even with extended intervals between distractor and target stimuli.
  • Varying interstimulus interval (ISI) alongside SOA did not diminish learning.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that close temporal proximity between a distractor and a target is not essential for contingency learning.
  • This challenges the necessity of immediate temporal contiguity for inducing associative learning.
  • Results have implications for understanding causal judgment and future contingency learning research.