Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Group Polarization

Group Polarization

Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.

In- and Out-Groups

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.

Impact of Groups on Groups

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...

Groupthink

Groupthink

When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...

Impact of Groups on Individuals

Impact of Groups on Individuals

Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...

Impact of Individuals on a Group

Impact of Individuals on a Group

In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[NEUROSPIRITUALITY].

Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina·2016

Same author

[Near death experiences].

Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina·2013

Same author

[Mirror neurons].

Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina·2013

Same author

[Music and brain].

Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina·2010

Same author

[The ghost of the free will].

Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina·2010

Same author

[The Charles Bonnet syndrome].

Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina·2008

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

[The power of ideologies].

Francisco José Rubia Vila

Anales De La Real Academia Nacional De Medicina

|January 24, 2012

Summary

Understanding the neurocognitive origins of ideological thinking is crucial to prevent historical atrocities. Dualistic thought patterns, linked to the right inferior parietal lobe, can dangerously simplify complex realities, leading to destructive outcomes.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Social Psychology
Neurobiology

Background:

XX-century ideologies caused immense suffering, highlighting the need to understand their cognitive roots.
Ideological thinking often involves closed worldviews and a strong dualistic component, simplifying complex realities.
This dualistic cognition is potentially linked to specific brain regions, notably the right inferior parietal lobe.

Discussion:

The dangerous potential of ideologies lies in the fusion of Manichean (dualistic) thought with emotional components.
This cognitive-emotional fusion leads to historical oversimplification, reification, and the demonization of opposing viewpoints.
Communism and National Socialism serve as stark historical examples of this dangerous cognitive perversion.

Key Insights:

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Dualistic thinking, a hallmark of many ideologies, may represent a distinct mental category.
The right inferior parietal lobe is implicated in dualistic cognitive processes.
The emotional amplification of dualistic thought poses a significant threat, driving destructive behaviors.

Outlook:

Investigating the neurocognitive underpinnings of ideological thinking is essential for preventing future historical repetitions.
Understanding these mechanisms can inform interventions aimed at mitigating the dangers of extremist ideologies.
Further research into the interplay of cognition and emotion in ideological formation is warranted.