Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

06:36
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
A controlled clinical exploratory study on genetic markers for peri-implantitis
Jan Hall1, Anna Ornhall Britse, Torsten Jemt
1Nobel Biocare, Goteborg, Sweden. jan.hall@nobelbiocare.com
European Journal of Oral Implantology
|January 28, 2012
Summary
Gene expression of bone resorption markers in peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) was similar between healthy patients and those with peri-implantitis. This suggests ongoing bone degradation was not detected in most peri-implantitis patients at the time of sampling.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Periodontology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Peri-implantitis is a common complication of dental implants, characterized by inflammation and bone loss.
- Understanding the molecular mechanisms of bone resorption in peri-implantitis is crucial for diagnosis and treatment.
- Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) contains biomarkers that may reflect the local inflammatory and bone remodeling status.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare gene expression of bone resorption/remodeling markers in PICF from healthy subjects and those with peri-implantitis.
- To investigate the presence of specific biomarkers such as TRAP, DKK-1, OPG, CatK, and OC.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving PICF sampling from 7 healthy subjects and 7 subjects with peri-implantitis.
- Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to analyze gene expression.
- Focus on biomarkers related to bone degradation and remodeling.
Main Results:
- Gene expression levels of bone resorption/remodeling markers were similar between healthy and peri-implantitis groups.
- Only one subject with peri-implantitis showed genetic markers for bone degradation, and this subject had rheumatoid arthritis.
- Six out of seven peri-implantitis patients did not exhibit detectable bone resorption markers.
Conclusions:
- Patients with clinical signs of peri-implantitis and bone loss may show similar gene expression profiles as healthy individuals.
- The absence of bone resorption markers in most peri-implantitis patients suggests bone degradation was not active at the time of PICF sampling.
- Further research is needed to understand the discrepancy between clinical signs and molecular markers of bone resorption.
