Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026
Robotic-assisted Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis
Published on: September 5, 2025
Cost comparison between hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy and open colectomy
Zheng Liu1, Gui-yu Wang, Ying-gang Chen
1Cancer Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Insights
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) offers better short-term outcomes than open colectomy (OC) with comparable total costs. HALC is a safe alternative for colectomy procedures.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Cost Analysis
Background:
- Open colectomy (OC) is a traditional surgical approach for colon resection.
- Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) is a minimally invasive alternative.
- Understanding the comparative cost-effectiveness of these procedures is crucial for healthcare providers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the total costs associated with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) and open colectomy (OC).
- To evaluate short-term surgical outcomes between HALC and OC.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patient data for HALC and OC between March 2009 and August 2010.
- Comparison of short-term outcomes: operative time, blood loss, lymph node retrieval, conversion rates, and complications.
- Analysis of direct hospitalization costs including operating room, nursing, ICU, anesthesia, and ancillary services.
Main Results:
- HALC group (42 patients) showed significantly shorter hospital stays, smaller incisions, faster bowel function recovery, and less blood loss compared to OC group (45 patients).
- No significant differences were observed in operative time, complication rates, or lymph node yield between the two groups.
- While operative costs were higher for HALC, total hospitalization costs were not significantly different ($5593 for HALC vs. $5638 for OC; P=.29).
Conclusions:
- Total costs for HALC are comparable to OC, making it a cost-effective option.
- HALC demonstrates superior short-term patient outcomes compared to OC.
- HALC is a safe and effective surgical approach for colectomy.
Purpose:
Our aim was to compare the costs associated with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) and open colectomy (OC).
Methods:
The data of patients who underwent either HALC or OC between March 2009 and August 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. The assessed short-term outcomes included operative time, blood lost, retrieved lymph nodes, conversion rates, and complications. Direct costs of operating room, nursing, intensive care, anesthesia, laboratory, pharmacy, radiology, and other costs related to initial hospitalization were compared.
Results:
Forty-two patients underwent HALC, whereas 45 underwent OC. Demographics in both groups were similar. The HALC patients had significantly shorter hospital stays and incision lengths, faster recovery of bowel function, and less blood loss (P<.001). There were no significant differences in operative time (169 minutes for HALC versus 171 minutes for OC), complication rates, or the number of retrieved lymph nodes. Although operative costs were higher for HALC (US $2260 versus $1992; P<.001), total costs were not significantly different between both methods (US $5593 vs. $5638; P=.29).
Conclusion:
Total costs of HALC are not significantly higher compared with OC. HALC is safe and leads to better short-term outcomes than OC.
More Related Videos
05:58Surgical Trunk Oriented Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy (ST-LRH) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
Published on: July 25, 2025
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
