Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

Reciprocity in attraction is fundamental to social and romantic relationships, shaping how individuals form and maintain connections. The psychological principle underlying this phenomenon is that people tend to like those who express liking toward them. Balance theory supports this tendency, suggesting that mutual attraction fosters psychological harmony, whereas one-sided affection leads to discomfort and cognitive dissonance.The Psychological Mechanisms Behind ReciprocityWhen individuals...

Relationship Growth

Relationship Growth

Interpersonal relationships progress through stages, beginning with awareness and moving toward mutuality, where emotional connections deepen. While many relationships remain at moderate levels of mutuality, deeper connections form through self-disclosure, trust, and interdependence.Self-DisclosureSelf-disclosure involves revealing personal information, starting with surface-level details and gradually progressing to more intimate content. As trust grows, individuals feel more comfortable...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

Equity Theory

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The hidden threat: Attending to passive risks heightens fear and risk perception.

Memory & cognition·2026

Same author

Bias is not color blind: Ignoring gender and race leads to suboptimal selection decisions-A registered report.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Same author

The cost of asking: Extending the dimensions of willful ignorance.

Current opinion in psychology·2025

Same author

Does curiosity make us riskier? The mediating role of willful ignorance.

Current opinion in psychology·2025

Same author

Cognitive empathy boosts honesty in children and young adolescents.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2024

Same author

The recursive nature of ownership intuitions.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023

Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Reciprocity and uncertainty.

Yoella Bereby-Meyer¹

¹Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel. Yoella@bgu.ac.il

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

|February 1, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Strong negative reciprocity, a key driver of cooperation in labs, falters in uncertain real-world environments. Costly punishment is less effective when intentions and actions are unclear.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Area of Science:

Behavioral Economics
Evolutionary Psychology
Social Psychology

Background:

Cooperation is essential for human societies.
Strong negative reciprocity (costly punishment) explains cooperation in controlled lab settings.
A gap exists between lab findings and real-world cooperation dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

To reconcile the discrepancy between laboratory and real-world cooperation.
To investigate the role of uncertainty in limiting strong negative reciprocity.
To assess the effectiveness of costly punishment in uncertain environments.

Main Methods:

Theoretical analysis of reciprocity mechanisms.
Review of existing experimental and observational data on cooperation.
Exploration of the impact of uncertainty on decision-making.

Main Results:

Strong negative reciprocity is significantly limited under conditions of uncertainty.
Uncertainty regarding players' actions and intentions reduces the efficacy of costly punishment.
Cooperation in the wild may rely on mechanisms beyond direct costly punishment.

Conclusions:

Costly punishment is a constrained mechanism for sustaining cooperation, particularly in uncertain real-world contexts.
The effectiveness of negative reciprocity is contingent on the clarity of actions and intentions.
Further research is needed to understand cooperation in complex, uncertain environments.