Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

09:32
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
Subject-specific computer simulation model for determining elbow loading in one-handed tennis backhand groundstrokes
Mark A King1, Jonathan A Glynn, Sean R Mitchell
1School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK. m.a.king@lboro.ac.uk
Sports Biomechanics
|February 7, 2012
Summary
Computer models simulating tennis strokes reveal minimal elbow loading differences between topspin and slice one-handed backhands. This research aids in understanding factors contributing to elbow stress in tennis players.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Science
- Computational Modeling
Background:
- Elbow injuries are common in tennis, particularly with one-handed backhand strokes.
- Understanding the biomechanical factors influencing elbow loading is crucial for injury prevention.
- Previous research often lacks subject-specific and equipment-specific impact analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the effect of ball-racket impacts on elbow loading during one-handed backhand groundstrokes.
- To compare elbow loading between topspin and slice variations of the stroke.
- To develop a computational model for analyzing tennis stroke biomechanics.
Main Methods:
- Developed a subject-specific, angle-driven computer model of a tennis player.
- Integrated a forward dynamics, equipment-specific model for ball-racket impacts.
- Validated simulations against an elite tennis player's performance with high accuracy (<0.5 degrees RMS difference).
Main Results:
- Elbow loading differences between topspin and slice one-handed backhands were found to be relatively small under similar impact conditions.
- Comparable wrist and elbow joint angle-time histories were observed, with major kinematic differences at the shoulder.
- The computational models successfully calculated peak internal loading, net impulse, and shock from ball-racket impacts.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a novel computational approach to assess elbow loading without invasive methods.
- Findings suggest that subtle kinematic differences, primarily at the shoulder, may explain the minimal elbow loading variation.
- This research lays the groundwork for future studies investigating factors that exacerbate elbow loading in tennis.

