Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cervical magnetic stimulation.

D Cros1, K H Chiappa, S Gominak

  • 1Clinical Neurophysiology Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

Neurology
|November 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional electrical stimulation to the affected lower limb and recovery after cerebral infarction.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2015
Same author

Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy implications.

Heredity·2015
Same author

Survival of Coelaenomenodera lameensis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Relation to the Physical Characteristics of Different Oil Palm (Elaeis sp.) Breeding Populations.

Journal of insect science (Online)·2015
Same author

Rigorous analysis of highly tunable cylindrical transverse magnetic mode re-entrant cavities.

The Review of scientific instruments·2014
Same author

Improving palm oil quality through identification and mapping of the lipase gene causing oil deterioration.

Nature communications·2013
Same author

Precise phase synchronization of a cryogenic microwave oscillator.

The Review of scientific instruments·2010
Same journal

Factors Associated With Disability Improvement and Worsening Independent of Attacks in Patients With AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD and MOGAD: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Neurology·2026
Same journal

Cost-Effectiveness of Intracranial Aneurysm Screening: A Systematic Review.

Neurology·2026
Same journal

Rare Eating Epilepsy: Co-Occurrence of Focal Cortical Dysplasia and Gray Matter Heterotopia.

Neurology·2026
Same journal

Spatiotemporal Associations Between Cortical Microinfarcts and Cortical Superficial Siderosis in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.

Neurology·2026
Same journal

Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Before Interhospital Transfer for Thrombectomy and Clinical Outcome.

Neurology·2026
Same journal

At Death's Door: Cytosolic Dopamine in Patients With Parkinson Disease.

Neurology·2026
See all related articles

Cervical magnetic stimulation effectively maps upper extremity muscles, providing reproducible and comparable results to electrical stimulation. This technique precisely locates nerve excitation sites for diagnostic accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Neuromuscular Physiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cervical magnetic stimulation (CMS) is a non-invasive technique for assessing peripheral nerve function.
  • Accurate localization of nerve stimulation is crucial for diagnosing neurological disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine optimal parameters for CMS of upper extremity muscles.
  • To establish normal values for CMS and compare it with electrical stimulation.
  • To assess the reproducibility and precision of CMS for mapping nerve excitation sites.

Main Methods:

  • Stimulation of the cervical region using a 9-cm-diameter magnetic coil in 21 healthy subjects.
  • Recording muscle responses in biceps, triceps, and abductor digiti minimi.
  • Comparison of magnetic stimulation with electrical wrist stimulation and needle root stimulation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of latency, amplitude, and inter-side differences.

    • Main Results:

    • Maximal muscle amplitudes were achieved with specific coil current directions for right and left upper extremities.
    • Optimal stimulation sites were identified at specific cervical vertebral levels (C3-C6) for the tested muscles.
    • Latencies were consistent despite amplitude variations; CMS evoked responses comparable to electrical stimulation.
    • CMS provided more proximal excitation than electrical needle root stimulation for biceps and triceps.

    Conclusions:

    • Cervical magnetic stimulation is a reproducible and reliable method for assessing upper extremity muscles.
    • CMS accurately maps the longitudinal site of nerve excitation, comparable to electrical stimulation.
    • The established normal values and methodology provide a basis for clinical application in neuromuscular diagnostics.