Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Long intergenic non-protein coding RNA-467 targets microRNA-451a in human colorectal cancer.

Oncology letters·2020

Same author

Reduced skeletal muscle independently predicts 1-year aggravated joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease·2020

Same author

LncRNA <i>Malat1</i> inhibition of TDP43 cleavage suppresses IRF3-initiated antiviral innate immunity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2020

Same author

Correlation between serum bilirubin levels and the severity as well as the prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Chronic respiratory disease·2020

Same author

Higher Cortical Dysfunction Presenting as Visual Symptoms in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Frontiers in neurology·2020

Same author

Effect of Renal Denervation on Cardiac Function and Inflammatory Factors in Heart Failure After Myocardial Infarction.

Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

Comparison of methods for identifying differentially expressed genes across multiple conditions from microarray data.

Yuande Tan, Yin Liu

|February 21, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing six statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data, this study found that the Optimal Discovery Procedure (ODP) offers high power but underestimates False Discovery Rate (FDR). Significant Analysis of Microarray data (SAM) performs best with large sample sizes.

More Related Videos

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization

Published on: October 3, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization

Published on: October 3, 2025

Area of Science:

Genomics
Bioinformatics
Statistical Genetics

Background:

Analyzing large-scale microarray data requires robust statistical methods to identify differentially expressed genes.
Numerous statistical approaches exist, necessitating comparative studies for effective experimental design.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the performance of six statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data.
To evaluate how factors like treatment effect strength, sample size, and gene expression variance influence method performance.

Main Methods:

Simulation studies were conducted to compare six methods: Bonferroni (B-), Benjamini and Hochberg (BH-), Local False Discovery Rate (Localfdr), Optimal Discovery Procedure (ODP), Ranking Analysis of F-statistics (RAF), and Significant Analysis of Microarray data (SAM).
Performance was assessed based on power and False Discovery Rate (FDR) estimation under various data scenarios.

Main Results:

ODP showed high power but underestimated FDR. SAM performed poorly with small sample sizes but excelled with large ones.
The B-procedure was stringent with low power. Localfdr and RAF demonstrated comparable performance to BH-procedure, with favorable power and conservative FDR.
RAF was optimal for small proportions of differentially expressed genes and weak treatment effects, while Localfdr excelled with large proportions.

Conclusions:

Method selection for identifying differentially expressed genes depends critically on data characteristics such as sample size and the proportion of true positives.
No single method is universally superior; ODP and SAM have specific strengths and weaknesses.
Localfdr and RAF offer balanced performance, making them suitable alternatives to the BH-procedure in many scenarios.