Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Effecting curricular change through comprehensive course assessment: using structure and process to change outcomes.
Ellen F Goldman1, Susan S Swayze, Sarah E Swinehart
1George Washington University Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Washington, DC 20052, USA. egoldman@gwu.edu
A revised course review process at George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences improved curriculum oversight. This enhanced faculty reflection and led to significant changes in course content and teaching methods for better medical education.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Curriculum Development
- Academic Administration
Background:
- Effective curriculum oversight necessitates regular assessment and enhancement of courses and their integration.
- Existing course review processes often underutilize available data and faculty input, limiting their impact.
- Guidance on structuring and executing effective course reviews is limited in the literature.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss a revised course review process implemented during a comprehensive curriculum reform at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences.
- To detail improvements in evaluation practices, data utilization, review timing, participant involvement, and structure.
- To highlight how the revised process fosters faculty reflection and leads to tangible improvements in course content and delivery.
Main Methods:
- Implementing a revised course review process grounded in medical and higher education literature.
- Incorporating a broader array of data for review.
- Modifying the timing, participants, and structure of review meetings.
- Utilizing questioning, writing, and dialogue to promote faculty reflection and learning.
Main Results:
- Course directors reported increased focus and gained new ideas through reflection and peer perspectives.
- Significant changes were made to course content, teaching methodologies, and learning assessments.
- Improved integration of courses across the undergraduate medical curriculum was achieved.
- The revised process elements were found to be transferable to other medical schools and educational reform initiatives.
Conclusions:
- The revised course review process effectively enhances curriculum oversight by promoting faculty engagement and data-driven improvements.
- The structured approach encourages reflection, leading to positive changes in course design and delivery.
- The model is adaptable for curriculum reform in medical education and beyond.
More Related Videos
10:17Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
Published on: November 15, 2024
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Metacognition
Critical Thinking
Colleges and universities are...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data from the...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Fundamentals of Nursing Process I