Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized,
Fakhar Z Khan1, Mumohan S Virdee, Christopher R Palmer
1Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Targeted left ventricular lead placement using speckle-tracking echocardiography significantly improves cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes. This approach enhances patient response and clinical status while reducing mortality and heart failure hospitalizations compared to standard CRT.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response depends on left ventricular (LV) lead placement at the latest contracting site, avoiding scar tissue.
- A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare a novel targeted LV lead placement strategy against standard CRT care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of a targeted approach to left ventricular (LV) lead placement on patient outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- To determine if guided LV lead positioning improves CRT efficacy compared to conventional methods.
Main Methods:
- 220 patients undergoing CRT were randomized into two groups: TARGET (guided LV lead placement) and control (standard unguided CRT).
- The TARGET group's LV lead was positioned using speckle-tracking echocardiography at the latest peak contraction site (>10% amplitude) to ensure scar-free placement.
- Primary endpoint was a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months; secondary endpoints included clinical response, mortality, and heart failure hospitalizations.
Main Results:
- The TARGET group showed a significantly higher response rate (70% vs. 55%, p=0.031) for the primary endpoint.
- TARGET patients experienced improved clinical response (83% vs. 65%, p=0.003) and a lower rate of combined mortality and heart failure hospitalization (p=0.031) compared to controls.
- LV lead placement concordant with the optimal site was more frequent in the TARGET group.
Conclusions:
- Utilizing speckle-tracking echocardiography for targeted LV lead placement in CRT significantly enhances treatment response and clinical outcomes.
- This strategy leads to improved patient status and reduced combined risks of death and heart failure hospitalization compared to standard CRT.
- The TARGET study demonstrates the clinical utility of image-guided lead placement for optimizing CRT.
More Related Videos
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019