Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Drawing Blood from Rats through the Saphenous Vein and by Cardiac Puncture
05:27

Drawing Blood from Rats through the Saphenous Vein and by Cardiac Puncture

Published on: August 23, 2007

A qualitative study of phlebotomy device selection.

Jennifer Downing1, Linda H Yoder, Kenn M Kirksey

  • 1Seton Healthcare Family, Austin, TX, USA.

Medsurg Nursing : Official Journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses
|March 14, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Burnout Experienced by Military Nurses: A Systematic Review.

Worldviews on evidence-based nursing·2026
Same author

A Concept Analysis of Expertise Associated With Practicing Clinical Nurses in Hospital Settings.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same author

Evaluating the impact of a structured medication optimisation review on prescribing patterns and bleeding risk among patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): a difference-in-differences study.

BMJ open quality·2025
Same author

Patient Preferences for Using Remote Care Technology in Heart Failure: Discrete Choice Experiment.

JMIR cardio·2025
Same author

Personalising renal function monitoring and interventions in people living with heart failure: a protocol for co-designing a care pathway in the RENAL-HF programme.

BJGP open·2025
Same author

Co-production of the 'My SJS Passport' to support survivors of Stevens-Johnson syndrome post-diagnosis and beyond: a proof-of-concept study.

Clinical and experimental dermatology·2025
Same journal

Using a Behavioral Response Team on Non-Psychiatric Nursing Units.

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·2023
Same journal

Delirium Screening of Patients on a Neuroscience Step-Down Unit.

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·2022
Same journal

Calming the Agitated Patient: Providing Strategies to Support Clinicians.

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·2021
Same journal

A Systematic Review of Care Needs for Surgical Patients with Chronic Opioid Use.

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·2021
Same journal

Preparing for Population Health.

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·2018
Same journal

Watch your Language!

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·2018
See all related articles

Staff decision-making for phlebotomy devices like Vacutainer and butterfly needles shows a gap between recommended and actual use. Understanding these choices can improve healthcare worker safety and correct device selection.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Devices
  • Healthcare Practices
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Limited comparative research exists on Vacutainer versus butterfly phlebotomy devices.
  • Phlebotomy device selection impacts healthcare worker safety and procedural efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the decision-making processes healthcare staff employ when selecting between Vacutainer and butterfly phlebotomy devices.
  • To identify factors influencing the choice of phlebotomy equipment in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative research methodology utilizing purposive sampling.
  • Exploration of staff experiences and rationales in phlebotomy device selection.

Main Results:

  • A discrepancy was identified between the recommended use of phlebotomy devices and actual staff practices.

More Related Videos

Selective Harvesting of Marginating-hepatic Leukocytes
06:53

Selective Harvesting of Marginating-hepatic Leukocytes

Published on: July 21, 2016

Selective Harvesting of Marginating-pulmonary Leukocytes
07:06

Selective Harvesting of Marginating-pulmonary Leukocytes

Published on: March 11, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Drawing Blood from Rats through the Saphenous Vein and by Cardiac Puncture
05:27

Drawing Blood from Rats through the Saphenous Vein and by Cardiac Puncture

Published on: August 23, 2007

Selective Harvesting of Marginating-hepatic Leukocytes
06:53

Selective Harvesting of Marginating-hepatic Leukocytes

Published on: July 21, 2016

Selective Harvesting of Marginating-pulmonary Leukocytes
07:06

Selective Harvesting of Marginating-pulmonary Leukocytes

Published on: March 11, 2016

  • Qualitative data revealed specific decision-making patterns and potential barriers to optimal device utilization.
  • Conclusions:

    • Findings highlight a gap between evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice in phlebotomy device selection.
    • Addressing these decision-making processes can lead to improved employee safety and more effective phlebotomy procedures.