Quality of care for myocardial infarction at academic and nonacademic hospitals
Loic Belle1, José Labarère, Magali Fourny
1Department of Cardiology, Annecy General Hospital, France.
Insights
Academic hospitals offer better care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients, improving survival through recommended therapies. This study compared care quality and mortality rates between academic and nonacademic hospitals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Debate exists on whether academic hospitals provide superior care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- This study aimed to compare care processes and mortality between academic and nonacademic hospitals in the current AMI management era.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare processes of care and mortality for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients treated at academic versus nonacademic hospitals.
- To assess the impact of hospital type and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capability on patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of prospective cohort data from 3059 AMI patients (1714 ST-elevation MI, 1345 non-ST-elevation MI).
- Patients were enrolled across 39 academic and 183 nonacademic hospitals in France.
- Comparison of unadjusted and adjusted 1-year mortality rates, focusing on receipt of reperfusion and recommended drug therapies.
Main Results:
- Unadjusted 1-year mortality was lower in academic hospitals for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (10% vs. 15%, P=.01).
- Patients in hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capability were more likely to receive reperfusion and recommended therapies.
- After adjusting for baseline characteristics and therapies, admission to nonacademic hospitals without PCI capability was associated with higher mortality for STEMI patients (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.49).
Conclusions:
- Academic hospital admission was linked to more frequent use of recommended therapies.
- This increased use of therapies conferred a survival advantage for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.
Background:
Whether academic hospitals provide better quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction is widely debated. The aim of this study was to compare processes of care and mortality between academic and nonacademic hospitals in the contemporary era of acute myocardial infarction management.
Methods:
We analyzed the original data from a prospective cohort study of 3059 patients, including 1714 with ST-segment elevation and 1345 with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, enrolled at 39 and 183 academic and nonacademic hospitals, respectively, in France.
Results:
Unadjusted 1-year mortality for academic and nonacademic hospitals was 10% versus 15% for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (P=.01) and 13% versus 14% for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (P=.75). Patients treated in academic or nonacademic hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention capability were more likely to receive reperfusion and recommended drug therapies than those treated in nonacademic hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention capability. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the hazards of death associated with admission to nonacademic hospitals with and without percutaneous coronary intervention capability relative to academic hospitals were 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.62) and 1.65 (95% CI, 1.09-2.49) for those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.66-1.36) and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.72-1.58) for those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, respectively. Further adjustment for receipt of acute reperfusion and recommended drug therapies eliminated all differences in mortality between the study groups.
Conclusion:
Admission to academic hospitals was associated with a more frequent use of recommended therapies, conveying a survival advantage for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
10:01Improvement of a Closed Chest Porcine Myocardial Infarction Model by Standardization of Tissue and Blood Sampling Procedures
Published on: March 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina V: Nursing Management
