[Cardiac resynchronization therapy: mortality, rehospitalization, and procedure-related complications. A three-year single-center observational study within the Italian Health System]
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Vittorio Palmieri1, Salvatore Pezzullo, Fernando Coltorti
1U.O.C di Cardiologia, Ospedaliero dei Pellegrini, ASL, Napoli. vpalmieri68@gmail.com
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable defibrillator (CRT-D) showed comparable benefits across different patient indication classes. This real-world study found similar outcomes in mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, and clinical response rates for advanced heart failure patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable defibrillator (CRT-D) is a key treatment for advanced heart failure.
- The comparative benefit of CRT-D across different established indication classes requires further real-world evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess if the clinical benefits of CRT-D vary based on the specific indication class for device implantation.
- To compare outcomes such as mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, and patient response rates among different CRT-D indication groups.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 103 patients who received CRT-D between 2006 and 2009.
- Patients were categorized into three groups based on CRT-D indication: Class IA, Class IIa (with atrial fibrillation), and a non-conventional (NC) group.
- Outcomes evaluated included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, NYHA functional class improvement, and implant-related complications over a 3-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality rates (20-23%) among the three groups.
- Rates of rehospitalization for worsening heart failure (22-33%) and the percentage of clinical responders (78%) were similar across all indication groups.
- Implant-related complications requiring reintervention (15-25%) were also comparable, despite slight differences in patient demographics and medication use.
Conclusions:
- The clinical benefit of CRT-D in advanced heart failure patients appears to be consistent across Class IA, IIa, and non-conventional (NC) indications in real-world settings.
- These findings suggest that CRT-D can be equally effective regardless of the specific guideline indication in appropriately selected patients.
Background:
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable defibrillator (CRT-D) may differ among classes of indications to device therapy.
Methods:
All-cause mortality, first hospitalization for non-fatal heart failure, stable improvement of NYHA functional class (responders), and implant-related complications were evaluated retrospectively in 103 patients selected among those (n = 133) who received consecutively CRT-D between 2006 and 2009. Patients were divided into three groups: group IA (n = 65) included patients receiving CRT-D for a class IA indication; group IIa (n = 26) included patients with atrial fibrillation and QRS ≥ 130 ms receiving CRT-D for a class IA indication; nonconventional group (NC) (n = 12) included patients with an indication to defibrillator implantation extended to CRT-D because of NYHA class III-IV and echocardiographic evidence of electromechanical dyssynchrony. Echocardiographic examination was performed in all patients to identify wall target for left-side lead placement.
Results:
Group IIa patients were slightly older than group IA patients (p<0.05); gender distribution, left ventricular ejection fraction at implantation, ischemic etiology, and heart failure treatment were comparable among groups (all p>0.5), except for a higher digitalis use in group IIa patients (p<0.05). In a mean observation period of 3 years (up to December 2010), the rates of fatal events (IA: 22%, IIa: 23%, NC: 20%), rehospitalization for worsening heart failure (IA: 30%, IIa: 33%, NC: 22%), clinical responders (IA: 78%, IIa: 78%, NC: 78%), implant-related complications requiring reintervention (IA: 15%, IIa: 19%, NC: 25%), including pocket or catheter infections (IA: 5%, IIa: 11%, NC: 8%) were comparable among groups (all p>0.5).
Conclusions:
In the "real world", the benefit of CRT-D in advanced heart failure patients might be comparable among class IA, IIa or NC indication.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use

