Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Challenges of measuring empathic accuracy: A mentalizing versus experience-sharing paradigm.

The British journal of social psychology·2022
Same author

Correction to: The effects of numeracy and presentation format on judgments of contingency.

Memory & cognition·2020
Same author

The effects of numeracy and presentation format on judgments of contingency.

Memory & cognition·2020
Same author

Catch that word: interactivity, serendipity and verbal fluency in a word production task.

Psychological research·2020
Same author

Incubation and interactivity in insight problem solving.

Psychological research·2018
Same author

Numbers in action: individual differences and interactivity in mental arithmetic.

Cognitive processing·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Utilities in the 2-4-6 task.

Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, UK. f.vallee-tourangeau@kingston.ac.uk

Experimental Psychology
|May 15, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Goal-driven reasoning in the Wason 2-4-6 task shows that emphasizing negative sequences improves hypothesis testing. Participants better discover rules when negative outcomes have higher utility, challenging assumptions about cognitive biases.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Making
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • The Wason 2-4-6 task is a classic test of deductive reasoning and hypothesis testing.
  • Previous research suggests human reasoning can be biased, particularly in abstract tasks.
  • Understanding how practical context influences abstract reasoning is crucial for cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how goal-driven utilities influence hypothesis-testing behavior in the Wason 2-4-6 task.
  • To determine if assigning different values to positive versus negative sequences affects rule discovery.
  • To explore the cognitive mechanisms underlying performance in practical reasoning scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Embedding the Wason 2-4-6 task within a practical reasoning scenario with defined number sequence utilities.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

  • Manipulating the utility assigned to generating positive versus negative sequences.
  • Analyzing participants' hypothesis-testing strategies, rule discovery accuracy, and testing behavior.
  • Main Results:

    • When positive sequences offered greater utility, participants performed poorly, testing fewer relevant triples and failing to discover the rule.
    • Assigning greater utility to negative sequences led to more diligent and creative hypothesis testing.
    • Participants were significantly more likely to discover the rule when negative sequences were more valuable.

    Conclusions:

    • Poor performance in the standard Wason 2-4-6 task may stem from an default bias towards sequences with positive feedback.
    • Reasoners can effectively engage with and utilize negative sequences when their relevance to goal achievement is clear.
    • Cognitive performance in hypothesis testing is highly sensitive to the perceived utility and goal relevance of information.