Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
A strategy to achieve CRT response in permanent atrial fibrillation without obligatory atrioventricular node ablation
Frank Himmel1, Michael Reppel, Kai Mortensen
1Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. Frank.Himmel@uk-sh.de
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves heart failure outcomes in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation may not be necessary for all AF patients receiving CRT.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective for severe heart failure with wide QRS, especially in sinus rhythm (SR).
- The role of atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation in CRT patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains debated.
- This study evaluates the benefits of CRT in permanent AF patients, with and without AVN ablation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of CRT in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF).
- To compare outcomes of CRT in permanent AF patients who underwent AVN ablation versus those managed with pharmacological rate control.
- To determine if AVN ablation is essential for optimal CRT outcomes in permanent AF.
Main Methods:
- Assessed New York Heart Association classification, QRS duration, and echocardiographic parameters pre- and post-CRT (12 ± 3 months follow-up).
- Studied 230 patients in SR and 46 patients with permanent AF (duration 2.1 ± 0.5 years).
- Performed AVN ablation only in AF patients with inadequate pharmacological rate control (≤80% ventricular stimulation).
Main Results:
- Biventricular pacing improved functional status, left ventricular ejection fraction, and dimensions similarly across all groups.
- Fifteen AF patients underwent AVN ablation.
- Biventricular stimulation percentage was comparable between SR, pharmacologically treated AF, and AVN ablated AF patients, with no impact on outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation may not be a mandatory strategy for all patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- CRT provides comparable benefits in functional status and cardiac remodeling regardless of AVN ablation in permanent AF patients.
Background:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established method in patients with severe heart failure and wide QRS configuration, particularly during sinus rhythm (SR). In CRT patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), there is no general consensus regarding the need for atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of CRT in permanent AF with and without AVN ablation.
Methods:
New York Heart Association classification, QRS duration, and echocardiographic parameters were assessed before and after CRT with a follow-up of 12 ± 3 months. Two hundred thirty patients in SR and 46 patients with permanent AF of 2.1 ± 0.5 years duration were studied. AVN ablation was performed only in AF patients with insufficient pharmacological rate control evidenced by ≤80 % ventricular stimulation.
Results:
Fifteen AF patients underwent AVN ablation. Biventricular pacing comparably improved functional status, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions in all treated groups. Biventricular stimulation percentage was 10% lower in pharmacologically treated AF patients over 1 year as compared to patients in SR and to AF patients undergoing AVN ablation, which did not affect outcome in this patient population.
Conclusion:
In patients with permanent AF and CRT, an AVN ablation strategy might not be strictly required in all patients.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
10:46Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management