Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Periprocedural myocardial enzyme elevation: prognostic implications for current practice
Sanjum S Sethi1, Avtar Singh, Michael E Farkouh
1Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Insights
Periprocedural myocardial enzyme elevation after cardiovascular procedures impacts patient outcomes. Routine measurement of cardiac enzymes post-procedure is debated due to varying study results and unclear guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarker Analysis
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Periprocedural myocardial enzyme elevation is a significant concern following cardiovascular revascularization procedures.
- Despite its role in myocardial infarction definitions, routine postprocedural cardiac enzyme measurement is not standard practice.
- Existing studies show prognostic implications of biomarker elevations on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes, yet consensus is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review diagnostic and prognostic concepts of periprocedural myocardial enzyme elevation.
- To discuss the clinical impact and implications for practice-altering clinical trials.
- To highlight ongoing debates regarding optimal measurement strategies and cutoff levels.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on periprocedural myocardial enzyme elevation.
- Analysis of prognostic implications of biomarker elevations.
- Discussion of heterogeneity in study methodologies and findings.
Main Results:
- Periprocedural myocardial enzyme elevation has prognostic implications for mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.
- Heterogeneity in studies complicates establishing universal guidelines for measurement and interpretation.
- Debate continues regarding appropriate cutoff levels, biomarker assays, and measurement timing.
Conclusions:
- Clarifying issues surrounding periprocedural myocardial enzyme elevation is crucial for clinical management and trial interpretation.
- Further research is needed to standardize the assessment and clinical utility of these biomarkers.
- The prognostic significance warrants continued investigation into routine measurement protocols.
Abstract:
With the high volume of yearly cardiovascular revascularization procedures, periprocedural myocardial enzyme elevation remains an important topic. Although periprocedural myocardial enzyme elevation has been used in the universal definition of myocardial infarction, most hospitals do not routinely measure postprocedural cardiac enzymes. Multiple studies have illustrated the prognostic implications of such biomarker elevations on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes (especially in the short term), yet the question of routine marker assessments remains vexing. Heterogeneity in these studies has caused debate to continue regarding the appropriate cutoff levels, choice of biomarker assay, and situations in which markers should be measured. Along with the clinical implications of clarifying these issues, we acknowledge the impact on the management and interpretation of our large-scale, practice-altering clinical trials. In this review, we highlight significant concepts in the diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical impact of periprocedural myocardial enzyme elevation.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
