Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026
05:21
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
Comparison of Scoring Methods for ACE-27: Simpler Is Better.
Dorina Kallogjeri1, Jay F Piccirillo, Edward L Spitznagel
1Clinical Outcomes Research Office, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Journal of Geriatric Oncology
|June 20, 2012
Summary
Comorbidity significantly impacts survival in elderly cancer patients, particularly for less aggressive cancers like prostate and breast cancer. Different health conditions affect survival differently, requiring tailored scoring for accurate prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Geriatric oncology
- Cancer epidemiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Comorbidity is prevalent in elderly cancer patients.
- Accurate assessment of comorbidity is crucial for cancer prognosis.
- Existing coding schemes may not fully capture prognostic impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic value of various comorbidity coding schemes.
- To determine the impact of comorbidities on survival in elderly cancer patients.
- To identify optimal methods for incorporating comorbidity data into survival prediction models.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 8,867 elderly cancer patients (≥65 years).
- Utilized the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 index (ACE-27) for comorbidity assessment.
- Employed Harrell's c-index and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to compare model performance.
Main Results:
- Comorbidity improved survival prediction (c-index increased from 0.771 to 0.782).
- Prognostic value was notably higher for prostate and breast cancer.
- A simple linear scoring model, adjusted for cancer type, demonstrated optimal performance (AIC).
Conclusions:
- Comorbidity significantly influences survival outcomes in elderly cancer patients.
- The impact of comorbidity is more pronounced in less lethal cancers.
- Weighted scoring of individual comorbidities within the ACE-27 is recommended for improved prognostic accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
01:13Multiple Comparison Tests
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
01:10Bonferroni Test
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
01:09Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
01:22Compacting Factor test
The compacting factor test is a method used to assess the workability of concrete. It is especially suitable for concrete mixes containing aggregates up to one and a half inches in size. This test involves specialized equipment consisting of two truncated cone-shaped hoppers and a cylinder, all with polished interior surfaces to minimize friction.
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
01:16The Anderson-Darling Test
The Anderson-Darling test is a statistical method used to determine whether a data sample is likely drawn from a specific theoretical distribution. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require assumptions about specific parameters of the distribution. Instead, it compares the sample's empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) with the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the hypothesized distribution. Critical values for the test are specific to the chosen distribution rather than...