Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Hypothesis testing in noninferiority and equivalence MRMC ROC studies
Weijie Chen1, Nicholas A Petrick, Berkman Sahiner
1Division of Imaging and Applied Mathematics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA. weijie.chen@fda.hhs.gov
This study adjusts conventional multireader multicase receiver operating characteristic (MRMC ROC) methods for noninferiority and equivalence testing. The findings show these adjustments are crucial for accurately comparing diagnostic accuracies between imaging modalities.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging Analysis
- Statistical Methodology
- Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment
Background:
- Conventional multireader multicase receiver operating characteristic (MRMC ROC) methodologies are primarily designed for superiority testing of diagnostic accuracies.
- In practice, demonstrating noninferiority or equivalence of imaging modalities is often more relevant than proving superiority.
- Existing MRMC ROC frameworks require adjustments to accommodate noninferiority and equivalence hypothesis testing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and present appropriate adjustments to conventional MRMC ROC hypothesis testing for noninferiority and equivalence studies.
- To provide a framework for designing and analyzing studies that assess if one imaging modality is statistically noninferior or equivalent to another.
- To offer guidance on sample size calculations for such studies.
Main Methods:
- Three methodological adjustments to the Obuchowski-Rockette (OR)/Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM) MRMC ROC method are proposed.
- These include defining null/alternative hypotheses, data analysis methods, and study sizing procedures for noninferiority/equivalence.
- A clinical example illustrates the application of these methods for noninferiority MRMC ROC studies.
Main Results:
- Detailed procedures for analysis and sample size computation for noninferiority MRMC ROC studies are provided.
- It is demonstrated that an equivalence hypothesis test is equivalent to conducting two simultaneous noninferiority tests.
- The interplay between effect size, noninferiority margin, and sample size is explored.
Conclusions:
- Conventional MRMC ROC methodology can be effectively adjusted for noninferiority and equivalence hypothesis testing.
- These adjusted methods are essential for accurate comparisons of diagnostic performance between imaging modalities.
- Confidence intervals for differences in diagnostic accuracies should accompany hypothesis testing for comprehensive interpretation.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Types of Hypothesis Testing
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
McNemar's Test
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
