Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stationary vs. mapping manometry in evaluating dysphagia.

L Novais1, C Dalton, J E Richter

  • 1Section of Gastroenterology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Dysphagia
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

End-to-end SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks in sport: Current evidence and practical recommendations.

South African journal of sports medicine·2024
Same author

Unilateral congenital lip pits affecting the cutaneous aspect of the lower lip.

The Australasian journal of dermatology·2023
Same author

Three dimensional microelectrodes enable high signal and spatial resolution for neural seizure recordings in brain slices and freely behaving animals.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Learnings from efforts to synthesise evidence on the COVID-19 incubation period.

Public health·2021
Same author

Hendra in the Hunter Valley.

One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2020
Same author

Curriculum for neurogastroenterology and motility training: A report from the joint ANMS-ESNM task force.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2018

Stationary manometry accurately assesses esophageal motility disorders, correlating well with the mapping technique. This simpler method is effective for most patients with dysphagia, with mapping reserved for complex cases.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Esophageal Physiology
  • Diagnostic Techniques

Background:

  • Esophageal motility disorders are often evaluated using either catheter mapping or stationary manometry.
  • The distal esophagus is the primary site for motility disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy and correlation of stationary manometry versus mapping manometry in patients with dysphagia.
  • To determine the clinical utility of each method in identifying esophageal motility disorders.

Main Methods:

  • Esophageal manometry was performed on 30 patients with dysphagia using both stationary and mapping techniques.
  • Data analysis focused on correlation of mean distal amplitude, duration, and non-peristaltic contractions.
  • Sensitivity and specificity of stationary manometry were compared to mapping manometry.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Excellent correlation was observed between stationary and mapping techniques for key manometric parameters (r > 0.94).
  • 90% of patients received similar diagnoses from both methods.
  • Stationary manometry demonstrated 94% sensitivity and 93% specificity for motility disorders.

Conclusions:

  • Stationary manometry is a simple, accurate method for evaluating esophageal pressures and distal motility disorders.
  • Mapping manometry may be beneficial for identifying rare segmental motility disorders in patients with normal stationary study results.