Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
[Rupture of membranes in case of internal podalic version: a risk for cesarean section on the second twin]
E Rebufa-Dhenin1, A Flandrin, L Reyftmann
1Département de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Arnaud-de-Villeneuve, CHU de Montpellier, 371 avenue Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, Montpellier, France. elsarebufa@hotmail.com
Objectives:
To evaluate if internal version with ruptured membranes is a risk factor of cesarean section for the second twin.
Patients And Methods:
Two hundred and fifty-nine twins vaginal deliveries after 33 weeks of gestation from 1997 to 2009 in a level 3 maternity. A retrospective case-control study comparing two groups: cases of cesarean section on second twin and five twins vaginal deliveries following the case. Active management of the second twin delivery was performed with a short intertwin delivery.
Results:
Eleven cesarean sections on the second twin were performed (4.2%). The main indication was failure of internal version. The risk of cesarean section was significantly greater when the internal version was performed with ruptured membranes (OR: 25.4 IC 95% [2.3-275.7] P<0.003) and when intertwin time delivery interval was increased (8.1±5.1 vs 16.7±6.3, P<0.001).
Discussion And Conclusion:
The rupture of amniotic membranes before or during the internal podalic version is associated with a risk of failure and cesarean for the second twin. We recommend to perform the internal podalic version with unruptured membranes according to the French recommendations.
Related Concept Videos
Intestinal Obstruction II: Pathophysiology
Intrauterine Drug Delivery Systems

