Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
Cognition and Behavior01:23

Cognition and Behavior

Social psychology examines the complex interplay between individual mental processes and social interactions. Historically, the field was divided into two domains: social behavior and social cognition. Researchers focusing on social behavior analyzed actions within social contexts, such as conformity, aggression, or cooperation. Meanwhile, social cognition researchers investigated how people perceive, interpret, and mentally represent their social environments. However, modern perspectives no...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality01:30

Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality

Social cognitive perspectives on personality emphasize the importance of conscious awareness, beliefs, expectations, and goals in shaping behavior. These perspectives incorporate behaviorist principles, such as learning through reinforcement and conditioning, but extend beyond them by highlighting human reasoning and planning. Unlike traditional behaviorist views, social cognitive theory focuses on how individuals reflect on their past experiences and plan for future outcomes by considering...
Cognitivism01:17

Cognitivism

Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology01:20

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology

Cognitive psychology is the field of psychology dedicated to examining how people think. It attempts to explain how and why we think the way we do by studying the interactions among human thinking, emotion, creativity, language, and problem-solving, as well as other cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology studies how information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing.
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conflict Processing Is Unaffected by Stimulus Duration Across Multiple Visual Tasks: Evidence for Transient over Permanent Activation Models.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Motivation biases behavior but not perception.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Internal reference updating in visual duration discrimination: A search for boundary conditions : Internal reference updating.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Long-term Adaptation in VR: Retention of Altered Sensorimotor Contingencies through Redirected Walking.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

How visual eccentricity shapes conflict via target and distractor processing in the Simon task.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The role of feedback for sensorimotor decisions under risk.

Journal of vision·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm.

Roman Liepelt1, Anna Stenzel, Markus Lappe

  • 1Institute for Psychology, University of Muenster Muenster, Germany.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|July 12, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Automatic imitation remains intact during joint action, suggesting direct matching of observed actions. Task monitoring is dependent on timing, not specific response content, in social dual-task scenarios.

Keywords:
dual-taskjoint actionsocial PRPsocial cognition

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Automatic imitation involves directly mapping observed actions onto one's own motor repertoire (direct matching).
  • Previous research suggests task monitoring mechanisms are engaged during joint action.
  • The interplay between automatic imitation and task monitoring in joint actions requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if automatic imitation is disrupted during joint action.
  • To investigate whether task monitoring is dependent on the content or timing of tasks.
  • To explore the neural mechanisms underlying social interaction and motor control.

Main Methods:

  • A social dual-task paradigm combining an automatic imitation task and a number task was employed.
  • Participants performed tasks individually and jointly under varying stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA).
  • Reaction times and behavioral data were analyzed to assess imitation and monitoring effects.

Main Results:

  • Automatic imitation effects were consistently observed in both individual and joint conditions.
  • Reaction times for the second task (Task 2) increased as SOA decreased in joint conditions.
  • No evidence was found for the representation of the other person's specific stimulus-response (S-R) mappings.

Conclusions:

  • Automatic imitation is not disturbed by the presence of joint action.
  • Task monitoring in joint action appears to be time-dependent rather than content-dependent.
  • Findings support direct matching mechanisms for automatic imitation and highlight temporal factors in social task monitoring.