Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Remote ischemic conditioning in percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting
Tuncay Yetgin1, Olivier C Manintveld, Eric Boersma
1Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 50-60, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) may reduce myocardial injury biomarkers in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). While significant effects were seen in primary PCI and CABG, overall PCI results lacked statistical significance.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
Background:
- Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) shows potential for mitigating myocardial injury during PCI and CABG.
- Recent clinical trials present conflicting outcomes regarding RIC's efficacy.
- This meta-analysis evaluates RIC's impact on myocardial injury biomarkers in PCI and CABG patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically assess the effectiveness of RIC in reducing myocardial injury.
- To analyze RIC's impact specifically in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating RIC in PCI or CABG.
- Inclusion criteria required reporting of myocardial injury biomarkers (CK-MB, troponin T/I).
- Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using the Hedges g statistic.
Main Results:
- Overall PCI analysis (4 studies, 557 patients) showed a non-significant reduction in injury biomarkers (SMD: -0.21, CI: -0.66 to 0.24).
- Primary PCI subgroup analysis (314 patients) demonstrated a significant protective effect (SMD: -0.55, CI: -0.77 to -0.32).
- CABG analysis (13 studies, 891 patients) revealed a significant reduction in myocardial injury biomarkers (SMD: -0.34, CI: -0.59 to -0.08).
- Moderate to high heterogeneity was observed across studies for both PCI and CABG.
Conclusions:
- RIC is associated with lower myocardial injury biomarkers in PCI and CABG patients.
- The beneficial effect of RIC did not achieve statistical significance in the overall PCI patient group.
- RIC demonstrates a significant protective effect in primary PCI and CABG procedures.
Background:
Although remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) by transient limb ischemia in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has shown favorable effects on myocardial (ischemia-reperfusion) injury, recent trials provide inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of RIC in PCI or CABG.
Methods And Results:
Medline/Embase/conference reports were searched for randomized RIC trials and were included if they reported on biomarkers of myocardial injury (CK-MB/troponin T/I), after which, standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated (Hedges g statistic). Meta-analysis of 4 studies on PCI, involving 557 patients, indicated reduced biomarkers for myocardial injury with RIC compared to control (random effects model: SMD, -0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.66 to 0.24). Analysis of primary PCI studies, involving 314 patients, indicated a highly significant positive effect of RIC on myocardial injury (SMD, -0.55; 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.32). The 13 CABG studies taken together, involving 891 patients, indicated a significant effect of RIC on myocardial injury (SMD, -0.34; 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.08). The statistical tests indicated moderate to high heterogeneity across the studies (Q-statistic: PCI, P=0.0006, I(2)=83%; CABG, P<0.0001, I(2)=69%).
Conclusions:
In patients undergoing PCI or CABG, RIC with transient episodes of limb ischemia is associated with lower biomarkers of myocardial injury compared to control, but this effect failed to reach statistical significance in the overall PCI analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

