Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

08:35
An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
Published on: January 22, 2016
Item set discrimination and the unit in the Rasch model.
1Graduate School of Education, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. stephen.humphry@uwa.edu.au
Summary
This study introduces a new Rasch model parameterizing item sets for better measurement. This approach improves model fit and scale equating in large-scale testing programs.
Area of Science:
- Educational measurement
- Psychometrics
- Item response theory
Background:
- Traditional Rasch models parameterize individual items.
- Discrimination parameterization for item sets is challenging.
- Sufficiency conditions must be maintained for valid parameter estimation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a Rasch model variant that parameterizes discrimination for item sets.
- To maintain sufficiency conditions within this new model framework.
- To evaluate the model's performance against standard Rasch and 2PL models.
Main Methods:
- Formalizing the relationship between discrimination and metric units.
- Utilizing the raw score vector across item sets as the sufficient statistic for person parameters.
- Conducting simulation studies to test conditional estimation solution equations.
- Applying the model to real-world numeracy test data.
Main Results:
- The proposed Rasch model variant demonstrates improved model fit compared to the standard Rasch model.
- Enhanced accuracy in equating measurement scales was observed.
- The model provides a viable alternative for applied measurement contexts.
Conclusions:
- Parameterizing discrimination for item sets within a Rasch framework is feasible.
- This approach offers advantages in model fit and scale equating.
- The findings have implications for the application and development of Rasch models in large-scale assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Stereotype Content Model
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
McNemar's Test
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.

