Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026
08:57
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
Published on: August 14, 2018
Full modeling versus summarizing gene-tree uncertainty: method choice and species-tree accuracy.
L Lacey Knowles1, Hayley C Lanier, Pavel B Klimov
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA. knowlesl@umich.edu
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
|July 28, 2012
Summary
Choosing a species-tree method is complex. Sampling design and species divergence history significantly impact species-tree accuracy more than the analysis method itself, especially for recent divergences.
Area of Science:
- Phylogenetics and Evolutionary Biology
- Computational Biology
- Genomics
Background:
- The increasing number of species-tree inference methods presents a challenge for researchers in selecting the most appropriate approach.
- Theoretical considerations for method selection may not always translate to practical applications due to data complexity and computational limitations.
- Different species-tree methods vary in their treatment of gene-tree uncertainty, potentially affecting the accuracy of species-tree estimates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the trade-off between accuracy and computational simplicity in species-tree analysis.
- To compare the accuracy of different species-tree estimation methods by analyzing their treatment of gene-tree uncertainty.
- To identify the key factors influencing species-tree estimation accuracy, including method choice, species divergence history, and sampling design.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated species-tree accuracy across various methods, species trees, and sampling strategies.
- Partitioned the variation in accuracy to determine the relative importance of different factors.
- Focused on how different approaches handle gene-tree uncertainty, including Bayesian frameworks for modeling gene-tree uncertainty.
Main Results:
- Species divergence history and sampling design aspects were found to have a greater impact on species-tree accuracy than the method of analysis.
- Even with full modeling of gene-tree uncertainty, species-tree estimates may lack accuracy for recent diversification events.
- Empirical investigators can improve species-tree accuracy through strategic decisions about sampling, often more effectively than by changing the analysis method.
Conclusions:
- Factors controllable by researchers, such as sampling design, are crucial for enhancing species-tree accuracy.
- The level of genetic variation at a locus is a critical, previously underappreciated factor for accurate species-tree estimation in recent divergences.
- Future research should consider sampling strategies and genetic variation alongside method choice for robust species-tree inference.
Related Concept Videos
02:54Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
01:28Microbial Phylogeny
Understanding the evolutionary relationships among microorganisms is fundamental to microbial ecology and taxonomy. Phylogenetic trees are essential tools for inferring these relationships, relying primarily on comparative analyses of molecular sequences such as DNA, RNA, or proteins. In microbial studies, these trees typically depict the evolutionary paths of diverse bacterial and archaeal species by mapping genetic differences accumulated over time.Phylogenetic trees are composed of tips,...
02:05Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
02:05Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
03:21Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
03:21Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.