Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Before BeT: Behavior and timing in the age of introspection.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026

Same author

Does temporal reference memory change dynamically during temporal generalization performance?

Psychological research·2025

Same author

Meeting of minds: Skinner and Michotte at the International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, 1951.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2024

Same author

When 2 become 1: Autistic simultaneity judgements about asynchronous audiovisual speech.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023

Same author

Filling your time: Auditory flutter alters perceived duration via stimulus-locked responses.

Neuroscience letters·2023

Same author

Can't catch the beat: Failure to find simple repetition effects in three types of temporal judgements.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023

Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

Explaining between-group differences in performance on timing tasks.

John H Wearden¹, Luke A Jones

¹School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, UK. j.h.wearden@psy.keele.ac.uk

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)

|August 3, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Interpreting timing task performance differences requires careful modeling, as internal clock speed is often not the primary explanation. Mathematical models can clarify group variations, but distinguishing between different explanations remains challenging.

More Related Videos

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Psychophysics
Behavioral Neuroscience

Background:

Understanding group differences in timing tasks is crucial for various fields.
Previous interpretations often relied on simplistic explanations like internal clock speed variations.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the role of internal clock speed in explaining timing task performance differences.
To demonstrate the utility of computational modeling in understanding between-group effects in timing.
To discuss practical challenges and ambiguities in interpreting such models.

Main Methods:

Theoretical analysis of timing task performance.
Application of mathematical modeling to tasks such as temporal bisection and generalization.
Review and analysis of published modeling studies.

Main Results:

Internal clock 'pacemaker speed' is often an inadequate explanation for observed performance differences.
Computational models can effectively illuminate the sources of between-group variations.
Modeling has successfully explained differences between age groups and patient/control groups.

Conclusions:

While internal clock speed is a factor, it's not always the primary driver of group differences in timing.
Modeling offers a powerful framework for dissecting complex performance variations.
Further research is needed to refine models and resolve ambiguities in distinguishing between competing explanations.