Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Magnetic stimulation F-responses.

S Gominak1, D Cros, B Shahani

  • 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Clinical Neurophysiology Laboratory, Boston.

Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology
|December 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy implications.

Heredity·2015
Same author

Survival of Coelaenomenodera lameensis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Relation to the Physical Characteristics of Different Oil Palm (Elaeis sp.) Breeding Populations.

Journal of insect science (Online)·2015
Same author

Rigorous analysis of highly tunable cylindrical transverse magnetic mode re-entrant cavities.

The Review of scientific instruments·2014
Same author

Improving palm oil quality through identification and mapping of the lipase gene causing oil deterioration.

Nature communications·2013
Same author

Precise phase synchronization of a cryogenic microwave oscillator.

The Review of scientific instruments·2010
Same author

Intramuscular interferon beta-1a in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Neurology·2010
Same journal

Scientific basis for learning transfer from movements to urinary bladder functions for bladder repair in human patients with CNS injury.

Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology·2011
Same journal

Activity and asymmetry index of masticatory muscles in women with and without dysfunction temporomandibular.

Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology·2011
Same journal

Influence of gender on the EMG signal of the quadriceps femoris muscles and performance in high-intensity short-term exercise.

Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology·2011
Same journal

Common peroneal and tibial nerve paralysis secondary to herpes zoster infection: a case report.

Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology·2011
Same journal

Hearing evaluation of school children in Kuwait.

Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology·2010
Same journal

Visual evoked potential abnormalities in migraine patients.

Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology·2010
See all related articles

Magnetic stimulation enables simultaneous F-response measurement for median and ulnar nerves, reducing patient discomfort. However, in carpal tunnel syndrome, thenar F-responses may originate from the ulnar nerve, complicating interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Electrophysiology
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Conventional nerve conduction studies for median and ulnar nerves can be time-consuming and uncomfortable for patients.
  • Magnetic stimulation offers a non-invasive alternative for nerve assessment, but its focality for peripheral nerves is a limitation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of magnetic stimulation for simultaneous F-response latency determination of both median and ulnar nerves.
  • To assess the accuracy of this technique in healthy controls and patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a 9 cm Cadwell magnetic coil for wrist stimulation to elicit simultaneous median and ulnar nerve F-responses.
  • Recorded compound muscle action potentials and F-responses from thenar and hypothenar muscles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared F-response latencies between magnetic stimulation and conventional methods in controls and CTS patients.

    • Main Results:

    • Magnetic stimulation successfully recorded simultaneous F-responses from both thenar and hypothenar muscles.
    • No significant difference in F-response latency was observed between magnetic and conventional methods in controls.
    • In CTS patients, magnetically elicited thenar F-responses showed shorter latencies, potentially originating from ulnar-innervated thenar muscles, not median nerves.

    Conclusions:

    • Magnetic stimulation can simultaneously assess median and ulnar nerve F-responses, potentially shortening electrophysiologic examinations and reducing patient discomfort.
    • The lack of precise focality in magnetic stimulation limits its application, especially in conditions like CTS where thenar F-responses may be misattributed.
    • Careful interpretation is required when using magnetic stimulation for F-response latency determination in patients with peripheral nerve disorders.