Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Using mixture models with linear predictors to identify incorrect gestational age in state birth records.
Jack K Leiss1, C M Suchindran, Lakota Kruse
1Epidemiology Research Program, Cedar Grove Institute for Sustainable Communities, Mebane, NC 27302, USA. jackl@mcmoss.org
Maternal age and prenatal care timing significantly impact gestational age accuracy. Late prenatal care increases the likelihood of incorrectly reported gestational ages, especially for teen mothers.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Public Health
Background:
- Birthweight distributions show bimodality at early gestational ages.
- Some birthweights are implausible for the stated gestational age.
- Mixture models can identify these implausible birthweights.
Purpose of the Study:
- Identify maternal and infant factors for optimal mixture models.
- Improve accuracy of gestational age reporting in New Jersey birth records.
Main Methods:
- Utilized mixture models with covariates as linear predictors.
- Modeled means and proportions of component distributions.
- Allowed means and proportions to vary with covariates.
Main Results:
- Maternal age and prenatal care entry timing were key covariates.
- Older mothers with early care had fewer implausible births.
- Teen mothers with late care had the highest proportion of implausible births.
- Over 44% of births were classified with incorrect gestational age.
Conclusions:
- Maternal age and care timing improve models for identifying incorrect gestational age.
- Late prenatal care contributes to erroneously short gestational ages.
- Including linear predictors enhances classification validity.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Regression Toward the Mean
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
