Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

RNA-seq

RNA-seq

RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases.
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while microarray-based...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of postoperative shivering: a meta-analysis.

The Journal of international medical research·2016

Same author

Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: An Emerging Technology in the Toxicology Laboratory.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2016

Same author

A sensitive duplex nanoparticle-assisted PCR assay for identifying porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus from clinical specimens.

Virus genes·2016

Same author

HMGB1 translocation and release mediate cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation in mice through a TLR4/MyD88-dependent signaling pathway.

Molecular biology of the cell·2016

Same author

High NUCB2 expression level represents an independent negative prognostic factor in Chinese cohorts of non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients.

Oncotarget·2016

Same author

Effectiveness of a theory-based breastfeeding promotion intervention on exclusive breastfeeding in China: A randomised controlled trial.

Midwifery·2016

Same journal

OmicsTransformer: Self-Supervised Masked Consistency and Uncertainty-Aware Fusion for Robust Multi-Omics Prediction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same journal

Computational Tool Choice Impacts CRISPR Spacer-Proto spacer Detection.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same journal

ARISE: RNA-Anchored Shared-Edge Topology and Hierarchical Fusion for Spatial Multi-Omics Integration.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same journal

Interactive exploration of biobank-scale ancestral recombination graphs with Lorax.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same journal

PepMCP: A Graph-Based Membrane Contact Probability Predictor for Membrane-Lytic Antimicrobial Peptides.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same journal

ARGscape: A modular, interactive tool for manipulation of spatiotemporal ancestral recombination graphs.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Systematic comparison of RNA-Seq normalization methods using measurement error models.

Zhaonan Sun¹, Yu Zhu

¹Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA. sunz@purdue.edu

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)

|August 24, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new method to evaluate RNA-Seq normalization techniques without a gold standard. This system of measurement error models provides better insights into RNA sequencing data quality and normalization performance.

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

AQRNA-seq for Quantifying Small RNAs

AQRNA-seq for Quantifying Small RNAs

Published on: February 2, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

AQRNA-seq for Quantifying Small RNAs

AQRNA-seq for Quantifying Small RNAs

Published on: February 2, 2024

Area of Science:

Bioinformatics
Genomics
Computational Biology

Background:

Advancements in RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) necessitate robust normalization methods.
Current validation relies on gold standards (e.g., qRT-PCR, Microarray), which can have measurement error.
Existing methods lack informativeness regarding the quality of normalized RNA-Seq data.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a novel approach for comparing and validating RNA-Seq normalization methods.
To overcome the limitations of gold-standard-based validation in RNA-Seq data analysis.
To provide a statistically sound and informative framework for assessing normalization performance.

Main Methods:

Utilized a system of measurement error (ME) models incorporating qRT-PCR, Microarray, and RNA-Seq data.
Introduced performance parameters derived from the ME model system for method characterization.
Applied the approach to compare five existing RNA-Seq normalization methods using real-world data.

Main Results:

The proposed method does not require a gold standard for validation.
Performance parameters can be consistently estimated and used for comparison.
Gained significant insights into the strengths and weaknesses of five different RNA-Seq normalization methods.

Conclusions:

The ME model system offers a statistically rigorous and informative way to validate RNA-Seq normalization.
This approach enhances the reliability of RNA-Seq data analysis.
Facilitates informed selection of appropriate normalization methods for diverse RNA-Seq applications.