Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

How to Obtain Reliable Visual Event-related Potentials in Newborns
Published on: October 24, 2019
Delayed visual maturation in otherwise normal infants
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Pediatrics, St Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Insights
Otherwise healthy infants with decreased visual responsiveness have a good prognosis. Key indicators for a positive outcome include light reaction, normal pupils, no nystagmus, and no structural eye issues.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Medicine
- Developmental Pediatrics
Background:
- Infants may exhibit decreased visual responsiveness, often linked to systemic or ocular issues.
- A subset of these infants presents without identifiable medical or ocular problems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate prognostic factors for decreased visual responsiveness in otherwise normal infants.
- To determine predictors of visual acuity and developmental status in this specific pediatric population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of infants evaluated for decreased visual responsiveness.
- Inclusion criteria: no premature birth or systemic issues; exclusion: lack of follow-up.
- Prognostic indicators: light reaction, pupil response, nystagmus, ocular structure; outcomes: visual acuity, development.
Main Results:
- Thirty-two infants met study criteria; follow-up ranged from 3 months to 11 years.
- One patient developed strabismus requiring surgery.
- The majority of patients demonstrated normal vision and development.
Conclusions:
- Otherwise normal infants with decreased visual responsiveness have a favorable prognosis when specific ocular findings are present.
- Normal vision and development are expected outcomes for these infants.
- No additional testing is indicated at initial evaluation if key prognostic factors are met.
Background:
Children may present in early infancy for evaluation of decreased visual responsiveness. Most such infants have systemic or ocular abnormalities that explain their poor fixation and tracking. Some infants, however, have no other medical or ocular problems. This study evaluated prognostic factors in this latter group of otherwise normal infants with decreased visual responsiveness.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study in which medical records of infants evaluated for decreased visual responsiveness were reviewed to identify children who had no history of premature birth or systemic problems associated with developmental delay. Examination findings that were predicted to indicate a good prognosis included: the presence of some reaction to light, normal pupil responses, no nystagmus, and no structural ocular abnormalities. Follow-up information was obtained from office visits and telephone interviews. Main outcome measures were visual acuity and developmental status.
Results:
Thirty-two children met the criteria noted above. Six were excluded due to lack of follow-up. Four were normal by the time of their initial examination. Follow-up for the remaining patients ranged from 3 months to 11 years (mean 2.94 years). One patient developed strabismus and required surgery. The remaining patients all had normal vision and development.
Conclusions:
Otherwise normal infants who present for evaluation of decreased visual responsiveness have a good prognosis if they have some reaction to light, normal pupil responses, absence of nystagmus, and no structural ocular abnormalities. The developmental prognosis for these infants appears to be good. Additional testing at the time of initial evaluation is not indicated.
Related Concept Videos
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways
Visual Agnosia

