Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026
Culture of Bladder Cancer Organoids as Precision Medicine Tools
Published on: December 28, 2021
Comparative outcomes of primary, recurrent, and progressive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Francis Thomas1, Aidan P Noon, Naomi Rubin
1The Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, UK.
Background:
The treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) is problematic given the variable natural history of the disease. Few reports have compared outcomes for primary high-risk tumours with those that develop following previous BCas (relapses). The latter represent a self-selected cohort, having failed previous treatments.
Objective:
To compare outcomes in patients with primary, progressive, and recurrent high-risk non-muscle-invasive BCa.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
We identified all patients with primary and relapsing high-risk BCa tumours at our institution since 1994. Relapses were divided into progressive (previous low- or intermediate-risk disease) and recurrent (previous high-risk disease) cancers.
Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis:
Relationships with outcome analysed using multivariable Cox regression and log-rank analysis.
Results And Limitations:
We identified 699 primary, 110 progressive, and 494 recurrent high-risk BCa tumours in 809 patients (average follow-up: 59 mo [interquartile range: 6-190]). Muscle invasion occurred most commonly in recurrent (23%) tumours, when compared to progressive (20%) and primary (14.6%) cohorts (log rank p<0.001). Disease-specific mortality (DSM) occurred more frequently in patients with recurrent (25.5%) and progressive (24.6%) tumours compared to primary disease (19.2%; log rank p=0.006). Other-cause mortality was similar in all groups (log rank p=0.57), and overall mortality was highest in the progressive cohort (62%) compared with the recurrent (58%) and primary groups (54%; log rank p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, progression and DSM were predicted by tumour grouping (hazard ratio [HR]: >1.15; p<0.026), stage (HR: >1.30; p<0.001), and patient age and sex (HR: >1.03; p<0.037). Carcinoma in situ was only predictive of outcome in primary tumors. Limitations include retrospective design and limited details regarding bacillus Camille-Guérin use.
Conclusions:
Patients with relapsing, high-risk, BCa tumors have higher progression, DSM, and overall mortality rates than those with primary cancers. The use of bladder-sparing strategies in these patients should approached cautiously. Carcinoma in situ has little predicative role in relapsing, high-risk, BCa tumors.
