Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem: self-efficacy,...
Effects of feedback01:24

Effects of feedback

Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Negative and Positive Feedback01:18

Negative and Positive Feedback

Animal organs and organ systems constantly adjust to internal and external changes through a process called homeostasis ("steady state"). Examples of these changes include regulation of the level of glucose or calcium in the blood or internal responses to external temperatures. Homeostasis requires  maintaining an internal dynamic equilibrium:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Surgical Treatment.

Journal of Crohn's & colitis·2026
Same author

A Systematic Direct-to-Biology Approach Identified Potent Cereblon HaloPROTACs.

ACS chemical biology·2026
Same author

Investigating Iron Deficiency Anaemia in the Elderly.

The Ulster medical journal·2026
Same author

Multimodal Cytogenetic and Molecular Approach for the Detection of a Constitutional Balanced Paracentric Inversion Disrupting RB1 in an Infant With Bilateral Retinoblastoma.

Genes, chromosomes & cancer·2026
Same author

Oral language acquisition difficulties in patients with early-onset schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

L'Encephale·2026
Same author

An immunometabolic signature of major depressive disorder in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2026
Same journal

Is It My Responsibility? Professional Organizations' Perspectives on Disability Inclusion in Health Professions Education and Practice.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Integrated Team-Based Learning in a UK Undergraduate Medical Programme.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Women's Conferences in Medicine: Advancing Gender Equity in Medical Education.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Entrusting Attention: An Additional lens on Entrustable Professional Activity Assessment.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Students as Teachers (SAT) and Educators: An Online Elective in Medical Education.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Beyond Student Proactivity in Surgical Placements.

The clinical teacher·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

An analysis of multisource feedback within the foundation programme.

Pierre Ellul1, Alice Moore, Justine Camilleri

  • 1Mater Dei Hospital, Malta. ellul.pierre@gmail.com

The Clinical Teacher
|September 22, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Multisource feedback (MSF) assessments rarely raise concerns, but senior doctors are more likely to report them. Recommendations include specifying who should complete MSFs for better trainee performance evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Healthcare Professional Assessment
  • Trainee Performance Evaluation

Background:

  • Multisource feedback (MSF) is a mandatory assessment for foundation programme doctors.
  • The Team Assessment of Behaviour (TAB) tool assesses doctors on professional relations, communication, teamwork, and accessibility.
  • This study retrospectively analyzed MSF data to identify concerns and their relationship with submission numbers and staff groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the frequency of concerns in multisource feedback (MSF) assessments.
  • To determine if the number of MSFs submitted correlates with reported concerns.
  • To assess the relationship between staff groups and the likelihood of concerns being reported.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of anonymized MSF data from the e-portfolio Malta database.
  • Data collected from July 2009 to July 2010 for foundation programme doctors.
  • Inclusion of 1868 MSF assessments from 83 doctors (50 FY1s, 33 FY2s).

Main Results:

  • The vast majority of MSF assessments (97.86%) showed no concerns.
  • Concerns were raised for 21.7% of doctors.
  • Concerns were statistically more likely to be reported when MSFs were completed by senior doctors compared to foundation year doctors or nurses (p=0.016).

Conclusions:

  • MSF is a valuable tool for assessing trainee performance through diverse clinical colleague input.
  • Current guidelines should specify not only the number but also the proportion of MSFs completed by specific roles (e.g., supervisors, senior trainees).
  • Mandating input from specific staff groups may enhance the quality and utility of MSF for performance evaluation.