Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...

The Influence of Affect on Cognition

The Influence of Affect on Cognition

Positive affect significantly influences cognitive processes, including evaluation, memory, creativity, and social judgments. Compared to negative affect, positive emotional states promote more favorable interpretations of stimuli, cognitive flexibility, and heuristic processing. These effects highlight emotions' powerful role in shaping how individuals perceive, remember, and interact with the world.Influence on Evaluation and AttributionWhen individuals experience positive affect, they are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Nutritional Support Strategies for Refeeding Syndrome in ICU Patients: A Review of Current Evidence.

Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare·2026

Same author

Enzymatic Deacetylation as a Selective Strategy for <i>O</i>-GlcNAc Identification.

Analytical chemistry·2026

Same author

Long-term reversal of Duchenne muscular dystrophy via circular arRNA-guided exon skipping in monkeys and humans.

Cell·2026

Same author

RNA structure programs endogenous ADAR for precise and efficient editing.

Cell·2026

Same author

Study on the impact of latent classes of ego depletion on self-management behaviors in older adults with hypertension.

Frontiers in public health·2026

Same author

Automatic classification of kidney stone components based on smartphone microscopy and the GoogLeNet model.

BMC urology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Brain potentials associated with the outcome processing in framing effects.

Qingguo Ma¹, Yandong Feng, Qing Xu

¹School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Neuroscience Letters

|September 22, 2012

Summary

The framing effect influences decision-making, with negative frames triggering a stronger brain response than positive frames. This cognitive bias impacts how we process equivalent information, affecting our evaluations.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Decision Science
Social Psychology

Background:

The framing effect is a cognitive bias where individuals react differently to identical choices based on their presentation.
Understanding the neural basis of this bias is crucial for explaining decision-making processes.
Previous research has identified behavioral patterns but lacked detailed neural correlates.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the framing effect using event-related potentials (ERPs).
To examine how positive versus negative framing influences outcome processing in the brain.
To explore the impact of group size on the framing effect and its neural underpinnings.

Main Methods:

Participants evaluated outcomes framed positively (lives saved) or negatively (lives lost).
Event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically the feedback-related negativity (FRN), were measured.
Behavioral ratings of favorableness were collected across large and small group conditions.

Main Results:

The framing effect was observed behaviorally, with positive frames yielding more favorable evaluations.
A significant feedback-related negativity (FRN) was elicited by negatively framed outcomes compared to positively framed ones.
These neural differences occurred despite the objective equivalence of the presented outcomes.

Conclusions:

The framing effect is associated with distinct neural processing, particularly in response to negative framing.
The feedback-related negativity (FRN) serves as a neural marker for the impact of framing on outcome evaluation.
Findings support the associative model of attribute framing, highlighting valence-based processing in cognitive bias.