Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Ischemic Optic Neuropathy : A Target Trial Emulation.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Evaluating Associations Between Cumulative Use of Chronic Liver Injury-Inducing Antiretroviral Therapy and Hepatocellular Carcinoma, By Chronic Liver Disease Status.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2026
Same author

A sensitivity analysis approach to principal stratification with a continuous longitudinal intermediate outcome: applications to a cohort stepped wedge trial.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Dynamic case-control sampling for rapid estimation of vaccine effectiveness against an emerging infectious disease variant.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Mapping social determinants of health data in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Long-term memory effects of an incremental blood pressure intervention in a mortal cohort.

Biometrics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Bayesian inference for the causal effect of mediation.

Michael J Daniels1, Jason A Roy, Chanmin Kim

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. mdaniels@stat.ufl.edu

Biometrics
|September 26, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel Bayesian method for analyzing direct and indirect effects in clinical trials with continuous mediators and binary outcomes. The approach enhances understanding of mediation mechanisms in health research.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Mediation analysis is crucial for understanding causal pathways in health.
  • Estimating direct and indirect effects with continuous mediators and binary outcomes presents statistical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a nonparametric Bayesian framework for estimating natural direct and indirect effects.
  • To address identifiability issues using conditional independence assumptions and sensitivity parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a nonparametric Bayesian approach for mediation analysis.
  • Introduced conditional independence assumptions and sensitivity parameters for effect identification.
  • Utilized simulation studies to evaluate assumption violations.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method allows for the estimation of direct and indirect effects in complex mediation scenarios.
  • Sensitivity analysis provides a framework for assessing the robustness of findings to assumption violations.
  • The approach was successfully applied to a weight management clinical trial.

Conclusions:

  • The nonparametric Bayesian method offers a flexible tool for mediation analysis in clinical research.
  • The framework facilitates a deeper understanding of treatment effects through mediators.
  • This methodology can be valuable for interpreting results from clinical trials, particularly in behavioral and health interventions.