Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

A Common Marmoset Model of Mother-Infant Intervention for Breastfeeding Disorders in the Presence of Paternal Inhibition and Maternal Neglect
Published on: September 22, 2023
Early versus Late Trophic Feeding in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants
Akram Sallakh-Niknezhad1, Fazileh Bashar-Hashemi, Niloofar Satarzadeh
1Department of Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Insights
Early trophic feeding for preterm infants significantly reduces time to regain birth weight, duration of parenteral nutrition, and hospital stay. This approach supports improved outcomes for very low birth weight infants without increasing complications.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Perinatal Medicine
Background:
- Improved survival of preterm infants necessitates optimized feeding strategies.
- Trophic feeding offers benefits, but optimal timing for very low birth weight infants remains under investigation.
- Early enteral nutrition is crucial for gut development and overall health in premature neonates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the neonatal outcomes of early (<48 hours) versus late (>72 hours) trophic feeding in very low birth weight preterm infants.
- To evaluate the impact of feeding initiation timing on key clinical parameters.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for enteral feeding management in preterm neonates.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study involving 170 preterm infants (1000-1500g, 26-31 weeks gestation) was conducted.
- Infants were divided into an early trophic feeding group (<48h) and a late trophic feeding group (>72h).
- Outcomes assessed included time to regain birth weight, duration of parenteral nutrition, hospital stay, feeding intolerance, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and sepsis.
Main Results:
- The early feeding group demonstrated significantly shorter time to regain birth weight (13.75 vs 20.53 days, P < 0.001).
- Duration of parenteral nutrition (9.26 vs 14.11 days, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (12.14 vs 21.11 days, P < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the early group.
- No significant differences in sepsis incidence or necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were observed between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Early trophic feeding (<48 hours) is associated with significant clinical benefits for preterm infants.
- The findings support the routine use of early trophic feeding in very low birth weight preterm infants.
- Early initiation of enteral feeding does not appear to increase the risk of major complications like NEC or sepsis.
Objective:
Improved survival of preterm infants, beneficial effects of trophic feeding and limited data on timing management of enteral feeding for very low birth weight preterm infants requires more researches to determine the exact starting time and increased volumes. This study aims to compare early (<48 h) versus late (>72h) trophic feeding with respect to important neonatal outcomes.
Methods:
In a cohort study from September 2007 to October 2008, a total of 170 preterm infants (1000-1500 gram, 26-31 weeks) consisting of 125 who received trophic feeding enterally within the first 48 hours of birth (early group) and 45 fed enterally after 72 h0urs (late group), without major congenital birth defects and severe asphyxia entered the study. Bolus feeding was started in both groups at 1-2 cc/kg every 4-6 hours of human milk or preterm infant formula and was advanced 1-2 cc/kg/day if tolerated along with parenteral nutrition. Feeding intolerance, possibility of necrotizing entrocolitis (NEC), episodes of sepsis, body weight, length of NICU stay, and duration of parenteral nutrition were assessed serially.
Findings:
There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical and maternal characteristics of infants in the two groups. The time to gain birth weight (13.75±5.21 vs 20.53±6.31 (P < 0.001)), duration of parenteral nutrition (9.26±4.572 days vs 14.11±6.415 days (P < 0.001)), hospital stay (12.14±8.612 vs 21.11±1.156 (P < 0.001)) were significantly shorter in early compared to late feeding group; none of the two groups experienced a high incidence of late onset sepsis (P = 0.73). There was 1 case of confirmed NEC in every group.
Conclusion:
The benefits of early trophic feeding shown by this study strongly support its use for the preterm infants without adding to complications.
Related Concept Videos
Trophic Efficiency
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Trophic Levels
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Development of Human Microbiota
Development of the Oral Microbiota

