Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.
Storage01:23

Storage

A schema is a mental framework that helps individuals organize and interpret information. Schemata, formed from previous experiences, influence how we process new information: how we encode it, the inferences we make, and how we retrieve it. For instance, a schema for what a typical classroom looks like might include desks, a teacher's desk, a whiteboard, and students in such an environment. This expectation helps us quickly understand and navigate new classrooms without needing to analyze each...
Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory01:14

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

The cerebellum, while traditionally associated with motor control, also plays a crucial role in memory, particularly in procedural memory, which involves learning motor tasks that become automatic through repetition. For example, studies have shown that when the cerebellum is damaged, individuals or animals lose the ability to learn conditioned motor responses, such as the conditioned eye-blink response in classical conditioning experiments with rabbits. This study demonstrates the cerebellum's...
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enforced specificity of an entrenched symbiosis.

Current biology : CB·2025
Same author

Optoretinography with actively stabilized adaptive optics optical coherence tomography.

Biomedical optics express·2025
Same author

Ruptured Orbital Dermoid Cyst Masked as a Migraine in a 25-Year-Old Male.

Military medicine·2025
Same author

The impact of snap-to-target on speed and accuracy in a Go/No-Go target detection task.

Applied ergonomics·2025
Same author

Enforced specificity of an animal symbiosis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Bayesian analysis on missing visual information and object complexity on visual search for object orientation and object identity.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

What we remember affects how we see: spatial working memory steers saccade programming.

Jason H Wong1, Matthew S Peterson

  • 1Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444, USA. jason.h.wong@navy.mil

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|October 25, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Holding a location in spatial working memory speeds up eye movements (saccade programming) to that location, contrary to previous findings. This suggests shared neural circuitry between spatial memory and eye movement control.

More Related Videos

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
14:24

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

Published on: July 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
14:24

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

Published on: July 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental Psychology
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • The relationship between visual attention, saccade programming, and visual working memory is a long-standing hypothesis.
  • Previous research suggested that rehearsing a location enhances attentional processing and negatively impacts saccade programming.
  • Belopolsky and Theeuwes (2009) found that holding a location in working memory inhibits saccade programming to that location.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To replicate and extend the findings of Belopolsky and Theeuwes (2009) regarding spatial working memory's effect on saccade programming.
  • To investigate if the spatial memory effect occurs in different saccade-cuing paradigms, including endogenous and exogenous cues.
  • To determine the interaction between spatial working memory and various cue types like arrow cues, singletons, and irrelevant onsets.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to test the influence of spatial working memory on saccade programming.
  • Experiment 1 involved a direct replication attempt of Belopolsky and Theeuwes (2009) using a spatial working memory task.
  • Experiments 2 and 3 utilized different saccade-cuing paradigms (endogenous central arrow cues, exogenous irrelevant singletons) to assess the generalizability of the spatial memory effect.

Main Results:

  • Contrary to Belopolsky and Theeuwes (2009), Experiment 1 showed facilitation (shorter saccade latencies) when the saccade target matched the spatial working memory location.
  • Experiment 2 confirmed facilitation in an endogenous cuing task, where saccade programming was faster when the cued location matched the spatial memory.
  • Experiment 3 demonstrated that eye movements were more likely to target singletons that coincided with the location held in spatial working memory.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial working memory appears to facilitate, rather than inhibit, saccade programming when the target location matches the memory representation.
  • The spatial memory effect is robust across different saccade-cuing paradigms, including endogenous and exogenous cues.
  • These findings strongly suggest that spatial working memory and saccade programming share common, overlapping neural circuitry.