Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Validation of Seattle Heart Failure Model for mortality risk prediction in patients treated with cardiac
François Regoli1, Francesca Scopigni, Francisco Leyva
1Division of Cardiology, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, Via Tesserete 48, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
Insights
The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) showed modest survival prediction accuracy in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients, tending to overestimate survival. However, it effectively identified a high-risk subgroup needing comprehensive care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) is used for survival prediction in heart failure patients.
- Its accuracy in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is not well-established.
- Evaluating SHFM performance in the CRT population is crucial for refining treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive performance of the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- To assess the model's ability to discriminate between different risk groups within the CRT population.
- To identify factors influencing survival in CRT patients based on SHFM risk stratification.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of data from 1139 consecutive CRT patients across five centers.
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis stratified by SHFM score tertiles.
- Assessment of model discrimination using the c-statistic and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC).
Main Results:
- The SHFM demonstrated modest predictive performance, with an overall c-statistic of 0.64.
- Observed survival was generally higher than SHFM-predicted survival, indicating a tendency to overestimate survival.
- The high-risk tertile (T1) patients were globally more compromised, with independent predictors of death including male gender, ischemic heart failure etiology, lower body weight, and CRT pacemaker use.
Conclusions:
- The SHFM's performance in CRT patients is modest, suggesting potential overestimation of survival.
- The model successfully identified a high-risk subgroup requiring more intensive management.
- A comprehensive approach, including nutritional, metabolic, immunological aspects, and defibrillator backup, is recommended for high-risk CRT patients.
Aims:
Survival prediction by the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) of patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains ill defined. The performance of the SHFM in this clinical setting was therefore evaluated.
Methods And Results:
Data from 1309 consecutive CRT patients (five centres) were collected retrospectively; 1139 of these patients were considered for analysis. Three-hundred and seven deaths occurred over 40.1 months (interquartile range 25.2-60.0 months; mean event rate 9.7%/year; survival of 89, 81, and 64% at 1, 2, and 5 years). Kaplan-Meier event-free survival analysis stratified according to tertile of SHFM score was significant (log rank test P < 0.001). High-risk tertile (T1) survival was 82, 67, and 46% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Observed compared with SHFM-predicted survival was 0.11 vs. 0.08, 0.19 vs. 0.16, and 0.36 vs. 0.36, at 1, 2, and 5 years. Model discrimination by c-statistic was 0.64; the logistic models' area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of risk tertiles was 0.66, 0.68, and 0.67, at 1, 2, and 5 years. Compared with the other two groups, T1 was globally more compromised. Within the T1 group, independent predictors of death were male gender, ischaemic heart failure aetiology, lower body weight, and CRT pacemaker.
Conclusions:
SHFM performance was found to be modest, tending to overestimate survival. However, SHFM identified a high-risk, globally more compromised patient subgroup, hence supporting a comprehensive approach, which should include nutritional, metabolic, and immunological aspects, as well as defibrillator back-up.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
