Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Understanding Memory01:19

Understanding Memory

Memory is the retention of information or experiences over time, facilitated through three main processes: encoding, storage, and retrieval. Encoding is the process of inputting information into the memory system. For instance, when listening to a lecture, watching a play, reading a book, or having a conversation, the brain is actively encoding information. This initial stage involves transforming sensory input into a form that can be processed and stored by the brain. Various factors, such as...
System of Memory01:23

System of Memory

Memory is categorized into three major systems: sensory memory, short-term memory (STM), and long-term memory (LTM). These systems differ in their capacity and the duration for which they can hold information. Sensory memory captures raw sensory input from the environment, holding it for just a few seconds or less. For example, on hearing a brief, loud sound, like a car horn honking, the sound seems to linger in the mind for a moment even after it stops. This is an instance of sensory memory...
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction01:05

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction

It is far more common for collisions to occur in two dimensions; that is, the initial velocity vectors are neither parallel nor antiparallel to each other. Let's see what complications arise from this. The first idea is that momentum is a vector. Like all vectors, it can be expressed as a sum of perpendicular components (usually, though not always, an x-component and a y-component, and a z-component if necessary). Thus, when the statement of conservation of momentum is written for a problem,...
Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex01:23

Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex

The somatosensory cortex in the parietal lobes is crucial for interpreting sensory data such as touch, temperature, and proprioception. The somatosensory cortex, situated in the parietal lobes, plays a vital role in interpreting sensory information like touch, temperature, and proprioception—awareness of body position. This specialized brain region features an organized structure wherein neurons at the top primarily process sensations originating from the lower body. In contrast, those at the...
Rotter's Locus of Control01:14

Rotter's Locus of Control

Julian Rotter introduced the concept of locus of control, a cognitive factor that significantly influences personality development and learning. Locus of control refers to an individual's beliefs about the extent of control they have over events in their lives. According to Rotter, this belief system can be categorized into two types: internal and external locus of control.
Individuals with an internal locus of control believe that their personal efforts and decisions directly affect their...
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving01:06

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Initial Experiences on Risky Choice.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Combining social and private information: How ants use pheromones and learnt cues to navigate.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same author

Waiting for reward: preference for signalled delays increases with average wait time.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

Cognitive maps integrating locations but missing orientations in across-boundary environments.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Disrupted orientation after path integration by absence of anticipated prevalent spatial views.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Risky effort.

Cognition·2024
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Object location memory: integration and competition between multiple context objects but not between observers' body

Weimin Mou1, Marcia L Spetch

  • 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9. wmou@ualberta.ca

Cognition
|November 13, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Object localization relies on independent encoding of body-target and context-target information, which are optimally combined at test. Multiple context objects integrate, but close and far context cues can interfere.

More Related Videos

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants
04:47

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants

Published on: September 18, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants
04:47

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants

Published on: September 18, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Spatial Navigation
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Understanding how humans integrate spatial information from different sources is crucial for navigation and object localization.
  • The roles of observer's body position and environmental context as reference frames in spatial memory are debated.
  • Research has explored whether spatial cues are processed independently or interactively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the integration and competition between the observer's body and environmental context objects in object localization.
  • To determine how spatial information from body-target and context-target relationships are encoded and combined.
  • To examine the impact of multiple context objects on spatial memory and localization accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed object detection tasks in virtual environments after a delay.
  • Experiments manipulated the consistency of body and context object reference frames between learning and testing phases.
  • Performance was measured by detection accuracy of target object displacement.

Main Results:

  • Observer body and context object cues are encoded independently and combined optimally at test, without competition.
  • Multiple context objects are encoded in an integrated manner, enhancing performance compared to individual cues.
  • Close and far context objects can interfere with each other during encoding, reducing accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial representations of body-target and interobject vectors are processed separately and integrated flexibly during recall.
  • Contextual spatial information is integrated, but interference occurs between spatially distinct context objects.
  • These findings clarify the mechanisms of spatial reference frame utilization in object localization and spatial memory.