Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
The impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on ischemic mitral regurgitation
Anna M Booher1, Stanley J Chetcuti, David S Bach
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. amanion@med.umich.edu
Insights
Significant ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is common in patients undergoing multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but is not improved by the procedure. Inadequate pre-PCI echocardiography may lead to missed diagnoses of IMR.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Imaging
Background:
- Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a concern in patients undergoing multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- The effectiveness of PCI in addressing significant IMR requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if significant ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is adequately addressed in patients undergoing multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of a cardiac catheterization laboratory database over five years.
- Inclusion of patients who underwent multi-vessel PCI.
- Assessment of pre- and post-revascularization echocardiographic data, clinical data, and outcomes.
Main Results:
- Out of 150 patients undergoing PCI, 96 had complete pre- and post-procedural echocardiograms.
- 22% of patients had moderate or greater IMR.
- The severity of IMR did not significantly change after multi-vessel PCI.
Conclusions:
- Clinically significant IMR is not uncommon in patients treated with multi-vessel PCI.
- Percutaneous revascularization did not significantly alter IMR severity.
- Inadequate pre-PCI echocardiography in over one-third of patients suggests potential underdiagnosis of IMR.
Background And Aim Of The Study:
The study aim was to determine if significant ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is adequately addressed in patients undergoing multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
The cardiac catheterization laboratory database at the authors' institution was accessed over a five-year interval to identify those patients who had undergone multi-vessel PCI. Both, pre- and post-revascularization echocardiographic data were retrieved, and clinical data, MR presence and severity, and outcomes were each assessed.
Results:
In total, 150 patients (100 males, 50 females; mean age 63 +/- 12 years) underwent PCI. Of these 150 patients, pre-procedural echocardiograms were not performed in 54 cases (35%); hence, the study group comprised 96 patients with both pre- and postprocedural echocardiograms. Of these patients, 21 (22%) had moderate or greater (2+) IMR. The severity of the IMR did not change significantly after multivessel PCI (2 +/- 0.8+ preoperatively versus 1.9 +/- 1.0+ postoperatively).
Conclusion:
Clinically significant IMR occurred not infrequently among patients treated with multivessel PCI, but the severity did not change with percutaneous revascularization, despite this being predominantly complete. In more than one-third of the patients, adequate pre-PCI echocardiography was unavailable, which suggested the possibility that not all IMR had been identified.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction

