Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking II

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...

Critical Thinking I

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert Ellis's...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A Qualitative Analysis on the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Team-Based Learning.

Medical science educator·2023

Same author

"We know what they're struggling with": student peer mentors' embodied perceptions of teaching in a health professional education mentorship program.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2021

Same author

Threshold Concepts in Preclinical Medical Education: Students' Perceptions.

Medical science educator·2021

Same author

Intraoperative MRI versus 5-ALA in high-grade glioma resection: a network meta-analysis.

Journal of neurosurgery·2020

Same author

Sticks and Stones: The Impact of Language in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·2018

Same author

Pain and its metaphors: a dialogical approach.

The Journal of medical humanities·2011

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Rethinking clinical reasoning: time for a dialogical turn.

Stephen Loftus¹

¹Education for Practice Institute, Charles Sturt University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. sloftus@csu.edu.au

Medical Education

|November 23, 2012

Summary

Understanding clinical reasoning is crucial in medicine but remains complex. A dialogical approach offers a richer framework, integrating diverse theories and emphasizing language

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Philosophy of Medicine
Cognitive Science

Background:

Clinical reasoning is fundamental to medical practice and has been extensively researched.
Current theoretical models of clinical reasoning have limitations in explanatory power.
Existing models are often based on narrow assumptions about the nature of clinical reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore diverse conceptualizations of clinical reasoning for a deeper understanding of clinical encounters.
To propose a dialogical approach to clinical reasoning that integrates various theoretical frameworks.
To highlight the role of language, including narrative, rhetoric, and metaphor, in clinical reasoning.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of existing theoretical models of clinical reasoning.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Development of a dialogical framework for understanding clinical reasoning.

Integration of insights from different theoretical perspectives on clinical reasoning.

Main Results:

A dialogical approach provides a richer vocabulary for understanding clinical reasoning.
Dialogism facilitates the integration of strengths from diverse theoretical frameworks.
This approach emphasizes the complex use of language in generating meaning within clinical reasoning.

Conclusions:

A dialogical approach enhances the understanding of clinical reasoning without discarding previous findings.
It offers a means to integrate existing knowledge for more practical application in clinical settings.
This framework promotes a more nuanced view of clinical reasoning, incorporating linguistic complexities.