Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Assessment of apical radial pulse01:25

Assessment of apical radial pulse

Apical-Radial (A-R) Pulse Assessment
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Assessment of apical pulse01:17

Assessment of apical pulse

Assessing the Apical Pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management01:23

Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

During the postoperative period, it is crucial to focus on maintaining circulation, identifying and managing potential complications, and planning for discharge.Nursing AssessmentVital signs monitoring: Regularly monitor vital signs, including blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature, to detect early signs of complications such as bleeding and infection.Circulation assessment: Monitor pulses, perform Doppler assessments, and check capillary refill, color, temperature, and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Supporting Safer Surgery: System-Level Interventions to Enhance Pediatric Perioperative Safety.

Pediatrics·2026
Same author

Estimating the impact of missed cases on the accuracy of autism screening tools.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same author

Public Health Travel Restrictions Implemented for Persons at Risk of Transmitting SARS-CoV-2 Infection-United States, January 1, 2020-April 6, 2022.

Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP·2025
Same author

Addressing Late-arriving Surgeons in Support of First-case On-time Starts.

Pediatric quality & safety·2025
Same author

Optimization of a Sterile Processing Department Using Lean Six Sigma Methodology, Staffing Enhancement, and Capital Investment.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2024
Same author

Estimated Airline Compliance With Predeparture SARS-CoV-2 Testing for Passengers on Flights to the United States, January 2021 to June 2022.

Health security·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
08:21

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve

Published on: August 15, 2025

Perioperative employee annual evaluations: a 30-second process.

John Olmstead1, Deborah Falcone, Jacy Lopez

  • 1The Community Hospital, Munster, IN, USA.

AORN Journal
|November 27, 2012
PubMed
Summary

A new Surgical Services Employee Evaluation tool was developed to address vague criteria in hospital-wide evaluations. This tool enhances accuracy and reduces employee complaints regarding annual performance reviews.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
08:21

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve

Published on: August 15, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Nursing Education
  • Human Resources

Background:

  • The Community Hospital faced employee complaints regarding its generic annual evaluation tool.
  • Existing hospital-wide evaluations used vague criteria, leading to disputes.
  • A need existed for a more specific and objective performance appraisal tool for surgical services.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and implement a specialized evaluation tool for perioperative Registered Nurses (RNs).
  • To improve the accuracy and meaningfulness of annual employee evaluations.
  • To reduce post-evaluation employee complaints and manager-employee conflict.

Main Methods:

  • A new evaluation tool was created by the surgical services management team.
  • The tool focuses on three key categories: teamwork, patient care, and job preparation.
  • It was designed for quick completion (approx. 30 seconds) and integration with existing hospital forms.

Main Results:

  • The new tool significantly reduced post-evaluation employee complaints.
  • It enhanced the accuracy and perceived fairness of annual evaluations.
  • Managers reported high satisfaction, finding it aids in evaluation and counseling.

Conclusions:

  • The specialized Surgical Services Employee Evaluation tool effectively addresses limitations of generic hospital evaluations.
  • Its adoption has led to increased employee satisfaction and reduced workplace friction.
  • The tool's adaptability is demonstrated by its use in other departments with modifications.