Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026
23:53
Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
Published on: April 29, 2007
Failure to consider a radically new scientific idea or theory
1Massachusetts College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. michael.montagne@mcphs.edu
Substance Use & Misuse
|November 29, 2012
Summary
Scientists often fail to consider new scientific theories due to various barriers. Overcoming these requires reflection on past failures and a willingness to evaluate novel ideas before judgment.
Area of Science:
- Integrative sciences
- Philosophy of science
- Scientific methodology
Background:
- Historical examples demonstrate a recurring failure in science to embrace novel theories.
- This pattern is observed across diverse fields, from geology to medicine.
Observation:
- Analysis of diverse scientific fields reveals a pattern of resistance to innovation.
- Specific examples include the slow adoption of plate tectonics and debates surrounding medical marijuana.
- Barriers to accepting new theories are multifaceted and recurring.
Findings:
- Identified numerous reasons and barriers contributing to the failure to consider new scientific ideas.
- These barriers impede scientific progress and the evolution of knowledge.
- Resistance stems from cognitive, social, and institutional factors within the scientific community.
Implications:
- Understanding these barriers is crucial for fostering scientific advancement.
- A willingness to test and evaluate novel theories is essential for scientific progress.
- Reflecting on past failures can guide future acceptance of groundbreaking scientific concepts.
Related Concept Videos
01:17Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
03:50The Scientific Method
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
02:40The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
01:32The Scientific Method
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
01:31Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
01:23Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...